Tools & Wizards About Us
iso16363.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

iso16363.org

ISO16363 certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

339 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

70 ms

iso16363.org screenshot

About Website

Visit iso16363.org now to see the best up-to-date ISO16363 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about iso16363.org

PTAB is the first organisation in the world to be accredited to perform ISO 16363 audit and certification to attest that a digital repository is trustworthy in terms of preserving the valuable digital...

Visit iso16363.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Iso16363.org page load time and found that the first response time was 339 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

iso16363.org performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.1 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.digitalpreserve.info

339 ms

sdm_wp_styles.css

161 ms

twentyfourteen.css

162 ms

css

32 ms

global.css

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Iso16363.org, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Stats.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (676 ms) relates to the external source Digitalpreserve.info.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 106.8 kB (22%)

Content Size

490.7 kB

After Optimization

383.9 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Iso16363.org main page is 490.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 224.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 70.8 kB

  • Original 88.4 kB
  • After minification 87.2 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 178.1 kB
  • After minification 178.1 kB
  • After compression 169.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 27.4 kB

  • Original 224.2 kB
  • After minification 211.6 kB
  • After compression 196.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iso16363.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (96%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ISO16363. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 43 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.digitalpreserve.info

www.digitalpreserve.info

339 ms

sdm_wp_styles.css

sdm_wp_styles.css

161 ms

twentyfourteen.css

twentyfourteen.css

162 ms

css

css

32 ms

global.css

global.css

169 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

255 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

167 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

380 ms

css

css

25 ms

front.css

front.css

239 ms

styles.css

styles.css

240 ms

styles.css

styles.css

251 ms

styles.css

styles.css

253 ms

styles.css

styles.css

319 ms

bootstrap-grid.min.css

bootstrap-grid.min.css

321 ms

styles.css

styles.css

334 ms

slick.css

slick.css

338 ms

styles.css

styles.css

336 ms

styles.css

styles.css

398 ms

styles.css

styles.css

399 ms

skins.css

skins.css

417 ms

styles.css

styles.css

420 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

431 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

465 ms

front.css

front.css

478 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

561 ms

everest-forms.css

everest-forms.css

506 ms

intlTelInput.css

intlTelInput.css

504 ms

page-list.css

page-list.css

516 ms

wpProQuiz_front.min.css

wpProQuiz_front.min.css

549 ms

font-lato.css

font-lato.css

558 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

589 ms

style.css

style.css

592 ms

blocks.css

blocks.css

601 ms

featherlight.css

featherlight.css

633 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

638 ms

survey-front-end.css

survey-front-end.css

640 ms

survey-general.css

survey-general.css

676 ms

e-202435.js

e-202435.js

10 ms

default.css

default.css

598 ms

masterslider.main.css

masterslider.main.css

535 ms

custom.css

custom.css

561 ms

style-front.css

style-front.css

556 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

563 ms

zotpress.shortcode.min.css

zotpress.shortcode.min.css

524 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

535 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

533 ms

circle-progress.js

circle-progress.js

553 ms

global.js

global.js

545 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

494 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

528 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

528 ms

front.js

front.js

531 ms

sdm_wp_scripts.js

sdm_wp_scripts.js

546 ms

functions.js

functions.js

512 ms

sweetalert.min.js

sweetalert.min.js

495 ms

featherlight.js

featherlight.js

535 ms

survey.common.js

survey.common.js

527 ms

survey.main.js

survey.main.js

530 ms

ai.min.js

ai.min.js

529 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

544 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

529 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

511 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

519 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

520 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

493 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

494 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

495 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

510 ms

index.js

index.js

516 ms

index.js

index.js

519 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

490 ms

dlm-xhr.min.js

dlm-xhr.min.js

492 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

500 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

511 ms

lato-all-400-normal.woff

lato-all-400-normal.woff

191 ms

lato-all-300-normal.woff

lato-all-300-normal.woff

199 ms

lato-all-700-normal.woff

lato-all-700-normal.woff

273 ms

lato-all-900-normal.woff

lato-all-900-normal.woff

204 ms

Genericons.svg

Genericons.svg

301 ms

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=

1 ms

Accessibility Review

iso16363.org accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

iso16363.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

iso16363.org SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iso16363.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Iso16363.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

iso16363.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ISO16363. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: