Tools & Wizards About Us
isolapse.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

isolapse.com

Isolapse - Photography & Filmmaking Gear News & Reviews

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

215 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

isolapse.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Isolapse content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about isolapse.com

Get the latest News on Cameras, Lighting Equipment, Accessories, Softwares, etc used in Photography and Filmmaking.

Visit isolapse.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Isolapse.com page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

isolapse.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,010 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.445

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.isolapse.com

215 ms

js

15 ms

global.css

147 ms

style.min.css

204 ms

styles.css

146 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Isolapse.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (848 ms) belongs to the original domain Isolapse.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 79.5 kB (8%)

Content Size

950.6 kB

After Optimization

871.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Isolapse.com main page is 950.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 496.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 69.7 kB

  • Original 87.0 kB
  • After minification 85.9 kB
  • After compression 17.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 328.4 kB
  • After minification 320.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Isolapse images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 496.0 kB
  • After minification 496.0 kB
  • After compression 494.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 644 B

  • Original 39.1 kB
  • After minification 39.1 kB
  • After compression 38.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Isolapse.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (49%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Isolapse. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.isolapse.com

www.isolapse.com

215 ms

js

js

15 ms

global.css

global.css

147 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

204 ms

styles.css

styles.css

146 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

187 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

19 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

27 ms

sidebar.min.css

sidebar.min.css

36 ms

cf-7.min.css

cf-7.min.css

45 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

58 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

153 ms

js

js

59 ms

index.js

index.js

139 ms

index.js

index.js

47 ms

api.js

api.js

47 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

48 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

77 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

77 ms

index.js

index.js

82 ms

main.js

main.js

91 ms

main.js

main.js

101 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

111 ms

Isolapse-Logo-for-Colormag-265-x-90-PNG.png

Isolapse-Logo-for-Colormag-265-x-90-PNG.png

332 ms

Best-32-inch-true-10-bit-monitor-for-color-grading-768x427.jpg

Best-32-inch-true-10-bit-monitor-for-color-grading-768x427.jpg

543 ms

bmpcc-vs-Nikon-Z6-768x427.jpg

bmpcc-vs-Nikon-Z6-768x427.jpg

542 ms

bmpcc-vs-a7s-iii-768x427.jpg

bmpcc-vs-a7s-iii-768x427.jpg

542 ms

bmpcc-vs-sigma-fp-768x427.jpg

bmpcc-vs-sigma-fp-768x427.jpg

540 ms

Medium-Format-vs-.xFull-Frame-768x427.jpg

Medium-Format-vs-.xFull-Frame-768x427.jpg

543 ms

full-frame-vs-aps-c-768x427.jpg

full-frame-vs-aps-c-768x427.jpg

540 ms

Mirrorless-vs-DSLR-cameras-768x427.jpg

Mirrorless-vs-DSLR-cameras-768x427.jpg

696 ms

Ball-head-vs-fluid-head-tripod-768x427.jpg

Ball-head-vs-fluid-head-tripod-768x427.jpg

699 ms

Ball-head-vs-Pan-head-tripod-768x427.jpg

Ball-head-vs-Pan-head-tripod-768x427.jpg

693 ms

pan-head-vs-fluid-head-768x427.jpg

pan-head-vs-fluid-head-768x427.jpg

693 ms

Flash-vs-Continuous-lighting-for-studio-portraits-150x150.jpg

Flash-vs-Continuous-lighting-for-studio-portraits-150x150.jpg

654 ms

Olympus-OM-D-E-M5-MkIII-150x150.jpg

Olympus-OM-D-E-M5-MkIII-150x150.jpg

645 ms

EOS_M200_BKTheFront_EF_M15_45mm_ISSTM_675x450-150x150.png

EOS_M200_BKTheFront_EF_M15_45mm_ISSTM_675x450-150x150.png

848 ms

A7sIII-150x150.jpg

A7sIII-150x150.jpg

780 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

463 ms

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

89 ms

ads

ads

427 ms

ads

ads

318 ms

ads

ads

325 ms

Accessibility Review

isolapse.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

isolapse.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

isolapse.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Isolapse.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Isolapse.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

isolapse.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Isolapse. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: