Tools & Wizards About Us
itextsolution.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

itextsolution.com

Loading...

Page Load Speed

9.2 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

7.6 sec

Page Rendered

573 ms

itextsolution.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Itextsolution content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about itextsolution.com

Visit itextsolution.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Itextsolution.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 8.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

itextsolution.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

47/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value39.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

itextsolution.com

1072 ms

bootstrap.min.css

779 ms

font-awesome.min.css

596 ms

simple-line-icons.css

568 ms

flaticon.css

588 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Itextsolution.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to C1.mylivechat.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) belongs to the original domain Itextsolution.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 48.2 kB (15%)

Content Size

325.1 kB

After Optimization

276.9 kB

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Itextsolution.com main page is 325.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 170.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 170.8 kB
  • After minification 158.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Itextsolution images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 33.1 kB

  • Original 104.9 kB
  • After minification 104.9 kB
  • After compression 71.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.1 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 49.4 kB
  • After minification 49.4 kB
  • After compression 46.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Itextsolution.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (45%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

36

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Itextsolution. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

itextsolution.com

itextsolution.com

1072 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

779 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

596 ms

simple-line-icons.css

simple-line-icons.css

568 ms

flaticon.css

flaticon.css

588 ms

settings.css

settings.css

588 ms

main.css

main.css

598 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

770 ms

animate.css

animate.css

877 ms

slicknav.css

slicknav.css

841 ms

river.css

river.css

950 ms

js

js

49 ms

jquery-min.js

jquery-min.js

960 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

880 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

2043 ms

modernizrr.js

modernizrr.js

2053 ms

nivo-lightbox.min.js

nivo-lightbox.min.js

1995 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

2945 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

2281 ms

count-to.js

count-to.js

2800 ms

jquery.parallax.js

jquery.parallax.js

2961 ms

smooth-scroll.js

smooth-scroll.js

2955 ms

jquery.slicknav.js

jquery.slicknav.js

2965 ms

main.js

main.js

2966 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

3210 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

3582 ms

chatinline.aspx

chatinline.aspx

150 ms

livechat2.aspx

livechat2.aspx

257 ms

css

css

20 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

116 ms

logo.png

logo.png

2461 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

2457 ms

timer.png

timer.png

2442 ms

featured.png

featured.png

3186 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

2962 ms

img-2.png

img-2.png

3067 ms

bg1.jpg

bg1.jpg

3870 ms

1.png

1.png

2963 ms

2.png

2.png

3067 ms

3.png

3.png

3091 ms

4.png

4.png

3183 ms

5.png

5.png

3267 ms

6.png

6.png

3321 ms

7.png

7.png

3326 ms

8.png

8.png

3395 ms

9.png

9.png

3419 ms

10.png

10.png

3479 ms

11.png

11.png

3576 ms

12.png

12.png

3554 ms

13.png

13.png

3590 ms

14.png

14.png

3636 ms

15.png

15.png

3629 ms

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

Simple-Line-Icons.woff

3961 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

fontawesome-webfonte0a5.woff

fontawesome-webfonte0a5.woff

3958 ms

16.png

16.png

2714 ms

17.png

17.png

3246 ms

18.png

18.png

3200 ms

19.png

19.png

3239 ms

20.png

20.png

2707 ms

21.png

21.png

2588 ms

testimonial-bg.jpg

testimonial-bg.jpg

3444 ms

avatar.png

avatar.png

2891 ms

collect

collect

163 ms

css

css

60 ms

chatinline.css

chatinline.css

56 ms

resources2.aspx

resources2.aspx

225 ms

slide.jpg

slide.jpg

2570 ms

3dlayer_3.png

3dlayer_3.png

2468 ms

livechatinit2.js

livechatinit2.js

39 ms

Accessibility Review

itextsolution.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

itextsolution.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

itextsolution.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Itextsolution.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Itextsolution.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

itextsolution.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Itextsolution. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: