Tools & Wizards About Us
itrack.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

itrack.ru

Разработка сложных проектов на 1С-Битрикс, экспертное внедрение CRM-систем

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

641 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

999 ms

itrack.ru screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Itrack content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about itrack.ru

Поддержка веб-сайтов на 1С-Битрикс быстро и удобно для Вас. Внедрение amoCRM и Битрикс24, настройка бизнес-процессов в Москве. Автоматизация отделов продаж специалистами нашей компании iTrack.

Visit itrack.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Itrack.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 641 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

itrack.ru performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,270 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.068

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

itrack.ru

641 ms

itrack.ru

444 ms

template_aefebc7656d7f1557d07cef4e9a2d337_v1.css

381 ms

core.js

632 ms

kernel_main_v1.js

512 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Itrack.ru, 6% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) relates to the external source App.hoversignal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 198.9 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Itrack.ru main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 72.8 kB

  • Original 86.0 kB
  • After minification 53.6 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.4 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 19.4 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 989.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Itrack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 94.5 kB

  • Original 561.8 kB
  • After minification 561.8 kB
  • After compression 467.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 94.5 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-36%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 33.5 kB
  • After minification 33.5 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Itrack.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 36% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (61%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Itrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

itrack.ru

itrack.ru

641 ms

itrack.ru

itrack.ru

444 ms

template_aefebc7656d7f1557d07cef4e9a2d337_v1.css

template_aefebc7656d7f1557d07cef4e9a2d337_v1.css

381 ms

core.js

core.js

632 ms

kernel_main_v1.js

kernel_main_v1.js

512 ms

dexie3.bundle.js

dexie3.bundle.js

511 ms

core_ls.js

core_ls.js

258 ms

core_frame_cache.js

core_frame_cache.js

434 ms

logo.svg

logo.svg

504 ms

logo-white.svg

logo-white.svg

514 ms

kim-rounded.png

kim-rounded.png

532 ms

svu1j4i5h78scm1hgmkgnbninma6uck5.png

svu1j4i5h78scm1hgmkgnbninma6uck5.png

1136 ms

v2g6tp837o3f2m18c1renagl4iq2wwa9.png

v2g6tp837o3f2m18c1renagl4iq2wwa9.png

1019 ms

4n6mstw8p0jpy522riusu7y1bzx3jr3x.jpg

4n6mstw8p0jpy522riusu7y1bzx3jr3x.jpg

891 ms

1ec4loe7p5q622g0f0g8g3d5xh3a9crb.svg

1ec4loe7p5q622g0f0g8g3d5xh3a9crb.svg

646 ms

nwul73vzy24dh2xuq9j67lx3h01je9r1.svg

nwul73vzy24dh2xuq9j67lx3h01je9r1.svg

658 ms

32apphcuv39iy31o5wvthk8ybflu7l4m.svg

32apphcuv39iy31o5wvthk8ybflu7l4m.svg

758 ms

jn417t9z2zmaeujkzjnv3goxh5f04pbl.svg

jn417t9z2zmaeujkzjnv3goxh5f04pbl.svg

774 ms

va6r8c2azwpc100s0js1c0j7ndkuk0xx.svg

va6r8c2azwpc100s0js1c0j7ndkuk0xx.svg

784 ms

template_7e5ba0338e7c03316de2b1f66e343f2d_v1.js

template_7e5ba0338e7c03316de2b1f66e343f2d_v1.js

1031 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

792 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

803 ms

demo.js

demo.js

909 ms

search.svg

search.svg

630 ms

close.svg

close.svg

640 ms

burger.svg

burger.svg

788 ms

arrow-out.svg

arrow-out.svg

788 ms

yt.svg

yt.svg

790 ms

vk.svg

vk.svg

791 ms

file.svg

file.svg

864 ms

burger-close.svg

burger-close.svg

886 ms

success.svg

success.svg

888 ms

arrow-down.svg

arrow-down.svg

889 ms

Inter-Regular.woff2

Inter-Regular.woff2

1114 ms

Inter-Medium.woff2

Inter-Medium.woff2

1066 ms

Inter-Bold.woff2

Inter-Bold.woff2

1066 ms

ba.js

ba.js

148 ms

tag.js

tag.js

855 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

90 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

18 ms

1f965ee3-b751-449c-bd71-4e99ddc9d9ba

1f965ee3-b751-449c-bd71-4e99ddc9d9ba

2189 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

collect

collect

26 ms

js

js

46 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

138 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

648 ms

sync_cookie_image_decide

sync_cookie_image_decide

137 ms

1

1

133 ms

Accessibility Review

itrack.ru accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

itrack.ru best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

itrack.ru SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Itrack.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Itrack.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

itrack.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Itrack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: