Tools & Wizards About Us
iwebsites.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

iwebsites.in

Intelligent websites | Home

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

480 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

86 ms

iwebsites.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing I Websites content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about iwebsites.in

Web applications,Website design, hosting, wordpress websites, magento,shopify

Visit iwebsites.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Iwebsites.in page load time and found that the first response time was 480 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

iwebsites.in performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.7 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.339

33/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.6 s

23/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

iwebsites.in

480 ms

secondFile.html

257 ms

bt

83 ms

require.min.js

51 ms

main-r.min.js

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Iwebsites.in, 73% (27 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (480 ms) belongs to the original domain Iwebsites.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (78%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

599.8 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Iwebsites.in main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 208 B

  • Original 484 B
  • After minification 484 B
  • After compression 276 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 208 B or 43% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 2.1 MB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB
  • After compression 598.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 17.0 kB

  • Original 18.6 kB
  • After minification 5.5 kB
  • After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Iwebsites.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (75%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of I Websites. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

iwebsites.in

iwebsites.in

480 ms

secondFile.html

secondFile.html

257 ms

bt

bt

83 ms

require.min.js

require.min.js

51 ms

main-r.min.js

main-r.min.js

56 ms

viewer.css

viewer.css

71 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

48 ms

7f022f_1a55dd33f9201ea2e2474c51cc91fde6_14.json.z

7f022f_1a55dd33f9201ea2e2474c51cc91fde6_14.json.z

317 ms

7f022f_374f4c96bd739d3a9b3a331e8873f46c_11.json.z

7f022f_374f4c96bd739d3a9b3a331e8873f46c_11.json.z

275 ms

ugc-viewer

ugc-viewer

39 ms

bt

bt

83 ms

skins.min.js

skins.min.js

134 ms

components.min.js

components.min.js

58 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

28 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

61 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

56 ms

wixappsCore.min.js

wixappsCore.min.js

56 ms

wixappsClassics.min.js

wixappsClassics.min.js

61 ms

layout.min.js

layout.min.js

59 ms

tpa.min.js

tpa.min.js

59 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

55 ms

wixappsBuilder.min.js

wixappsBuilder.min.js

129 ms

fonts.min.js

fonts.min.js

126 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

59 ms

swfobject.min.js

swfobject.min.js

58 ms

mousetrap.min.js

mousetrap.min.js

58 ms

wixCode.min.js

wixCode.min.js

124 ms

react-with-addons.min.js

react-with-addons.min.js

126 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

127 ms

zepto.min.js

zepto.min.js

125 ms

color.min.js

color.min.js

122 ms

experiment.js

experiment.js

81 ms

tweenEngine.min.js

tweenEngine.min.js

122 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

90 ms

dc.js

dc.js

32 ms

bt

bt

67 ms

DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

6 ms

Accessibility Review

iwebsites.in accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

iwebsites.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

iwebsites.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Iwebsites.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Iwebsites.in main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

iwebsites.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of I Websites. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: