3 sec in total
83 ms
2.4 sec
517 ms
Visit mon.itor.us now to see the best up-to-date Mon Itor content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mon.itor.us
WebServerTalk.com is Dedicated to Providing Web Server Tutorials, Guides, Reviews and More about Everything related to Linux & Windows Servers!
Visit mon.itor.usWe analyzed Mon.itor.us page load time and found that the first response time was 83 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
mon.itor.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value9.9 s
9/100
10%
Value1,750 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.035
100/100
15%
Value20.3 s
2/100
10%
83 ms
392 ms
130 ms
125 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mon.itor.us, 36% (20 requests) were made to Monitor.us and 22% (12 requests) were made to Monitorusportal.s3.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Monitor.us.
Page size can be reduced by 951.7 kB (53%)
1.8 MB
838.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Mon.itor.us main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 763.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 80.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 49.8 kB, which is 56% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 89% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 78.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Mon Itor needs image optimization as it can save up to 78.4 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 539.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 539.9 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 253.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mon.itor.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 253.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (51%)
49
24
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mon Itor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
mon.itor.us
83 ms
www.monitor.us
392 ms
ui.min.css
130 ms
index.min.css
125 ms
css
25 ms
css
36 ms
page-home.min.css
129 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
jquery-ui.js
19 ms
imagefader-min.js
206 ms
94842541.js
115 ms
ui.min.js
267 ms
jquery.dropdownPlain.min.js
264 ms
tracking.js
122 ms
clouds_eagle.png
117 ms
about-eagle.png
157 ms
trustedby-en.png
167 ms
1.png
163 ms
2.png
161 ms
3.png
242 ms
4.png
808 ms
5.png
279 ms
6.png
337 ms
7.png
307 ms
live_chat.png
397 ms
gtm.js
110 ms
monitor_us_Icons.png
1628 ms
monitorus-logos.png
456 ms
shaddow.png
103 ms
Va2wvH_psOw
196 ms
stikcer-icons.png
700 ms
underline.png
42 ms
tinydot.png
42 ms
laptop.jpg
47 ms
skyblend.png
44 ms
clouds_to_blue_sml.png
41 ms
clouds_to_grey_sml.png
44 ms
soaring_eagle_large.png
43 ms
arrow2.png
45 ms
feather.png
46 ms
monitor_us_logo_Icons.png
50 ms
kpI87QY2ce-mk2ZnKb-r0g.ttf
45 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xJhsE6jcpsD2oq89kgohWx0.ttf
107 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
script_data.js
161 ms
collect
53 ms
www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css
108 ms
www-embed-player.js
169 ms
base.js
274 ms
localization.en.1.3632191afe35222a6b78c04d457adc0d.js
149 ms
ping
141 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
86 ms
ad_status.js
79 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
141 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
140 ms
mon.itor.us accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
mon.itor.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
mon.itor.us SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mon.itor.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mon.itor.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mon.itor.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mon Itor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: