Access roakes.insanejournal.com. theo's Journal

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

99/100

10%

roakes.insanejournal.com

113 ms

core.js

108 ms

dom.js

110 ms

httpreq.js

84 ms

livejournal.js

78 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Roakes.insanejournal.com, 90% (9 requests) were made to Insanejournal.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (119 ms) relates to the external source Insanejournal.com.

Content Size

112.2 kB

After Optimization

42.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Roakes.insanejournal.com main page is 112.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 71.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

Original 5.8 kB
After minification 5.7 kB
After compression 1.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 13 B

Original 27.6 kB
After minification 27.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roakes Insane Journal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 59.6 kB

Original 71.0 kB
After minification 39.8 kB
After compression 11.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 59.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

Original 7.8 kB
After minification 4.3 kB
After compression 1.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roakes.insanejournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roakes Insane Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.