Tools & Wizards About Us
test.ipostal1.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

test.ipostal1.com

#1 Digital Mailbox - Over 500 iPostal1 Locations Worldwide

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

43 ms

Resources Loaded

892 ms

Page Rendered

408 ms

test.ipostal1.com screenshot

About Website

Visit test.ipostal1.com now to see the best up-to-date Test IPostal1 content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about test.ipostal1.com

Join the #1 digital mailbox service in the world. Select what best fits your needs and just like that, you have a new address and much more. See how it works.

Visit test.ipostal1.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Test.ipostal1.com page load time and found that the first response time was 43 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

test.ipostal1.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

68/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,720 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.8 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

test.ipostal1.com

43 ms

test.ipostal1.com

219 ms

10004097-10006712.js

220 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

96 ms

ab-testing.css

119 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Test.ipostal1.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (274 ms) relates to the external source Player.vimeo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.2 kB (14%)

Content Size

555.9 kB

After Optimization

475.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Test.ipostal1.com main page is 555.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 295.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 53.5 kB

  • Original 69.9 kB
  • After minification 69.9 kB
  • After compression 16.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 20.3 kB

  • Original 295.8 kB
  • After minification 275.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Test IPostal1 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 87 B

  • Original 149.1 kB
  • After minification 149.1 kB
  • After compression 149.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 41.1 kB
  • After minification 40.8 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Test.ipostal1.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (60%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Test IPostal1. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

test.ipostal1.com

test.ipostal1.com

43 ms

test.ipostal1.com

test.ipostal1.com

219 ms

10004097-10006712.js

10004097-10006712.js

220 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

96 ms

ab-testing.css

ab-testing.css

119 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

94 ms

header.css

header.css

102 ms

footer.css

footer.css

88 ms

pages.css

pages.css

105 ms

style2.css

style2.css

211 ms

plan-cards.css

plan-cards.css

162 ms

header_branding.css

header_branding.css

151 ms

bootstrap-v3.3.7.min.js

bootstrap-v3.3.7.min.js

164 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

41 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

63 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

27 ms

css2

css2

34 ms

css2

css2

48 ms

css2

css2

55 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

178 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

140 ms

blue-seal-200-130-bbb-161307.png

blue-seal-200-130-bbb-161307.png

132 ms

loading1.gif

loading1.gif

130 ms

google-stars.svg

google-stars.svg

136 ms

checkmark.png

checkmark.png

129 ms

footer-phone-white.svg

footer-phone-white.svg

130 ms

footer-mail-white.svg

footer-mail-white.svg

129 ms

Trusted-Badge-Light.svg

Trusted-Badge-Light.svg

194 ms

Download-on-the-App-Store%20Badge-Light.svg

Download-on-the-App-Store%20Badge-Light.svg

224 ms

Google-Play-Badge-Light.svg

Google-Play-Badge-Light.svg

190 ms

blue-seal-280-80-bbb-161307.png

blue-seal-280-80-bbb-161307.png

138 ms

ipostal1-logo-white.svg

ipostal1-logo-white.svg

198 ms

896577726

896577726

274 ms

ipostal1-app-user.jpg

ipostal1-app-user.jpg

158 ms

svg-sprite.php

svg-sprite.php

135 ms

Orange-Arrow.png

Orange-Arrow.png

209 ms

city.jpg

city.jpg

190 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5Q.ttf

74 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAw.ttf

104 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfMZg.ttf

132 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fMZg.ttf

131 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfMZg.ttf

131 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYMZg.ttf

131 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYMZg.ttf

128 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYMZg.ttf

127 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZg.ttf

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYMZg.ttf

131 ms

Twitter-Light.svg

Twitter-Light.svg

102 ms

Facebook-Light.svg

Facebook-Light.svg

96 ms

LinkedIn-Light.svg

LinkedIn-Light.svg

101 ms

YouTube-Light.svg

YouTube-Light.svg

133 ms

Instagram-Light.svg

Instagram-Light.svg

173 ms

81 ms

37 ms

main.js

main.js

21 ms

api.js

api.js

11 ms

Accessibility Review

test.ipostal1.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

test.ipostal1.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

test.ipostal1.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Test.ipostal1.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Test.ipostal1.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

test.ipostal1.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Test IPostal1. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: