Tools & Wizards About Us
voting.interiordesign.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

voting.interiordesign.net

SANDOW Design Group -

Page Load Speed

406 ms in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

235 ms

Page Rendered

159 ms

voting.interiordesign.net screenshot

About Website

Visit voting.interiordesign.net now to see the best up-to-date Voting Interior Design content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about voting.interiordesign.net

Interior Design's Best of Year Awards honor the best projects and products of 2016.

Visit voting.interiordesign.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Voting.interiordesign.net page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 394 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

voting.interiordesign.net performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.035

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.0 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

voting.interiordesign.net

12 ms

vote

8 ms

vote

47 ms

details

45 ms

application-9d82482c302cf97d32e73f111c8d9fa4.css

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Voting.interiordesign.net, 80% (12 requests) were made to Boyawards.interiordesign.net and 13% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (47 ms) relates to the external source Boyawards.interiordesign.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 424.5 kB (51%)

Content Size

835.4 kB

After Optimization

410.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Voting.interiordesign.net main page is 835.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 318.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 8.8 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

  • Original 309.3 kB
  • After minification 268.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Voting Interior Design needs image optimization as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 210.7 kB

  • Original 318.9 kB
  • After minification 318.9 kB
  • After compression 108.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 210.7 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 166.3 kB

  • Original 198.4 kB
  • After minification 196.8 kB
  • After compression 32.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Voting.interiordesign.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 166.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Voting Interior Design. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

voting.interiordesign.net

voting.interiordesign.net

12 ms

vote

vote

8 ms

vote

vote

47 ms

details

details

45 ms

application-9d82482c302cf97d32e73f111c8d9fa4.css

application-9d82482c302cf97d32e73f111c8d9fa4.css

17 ms

application-4ebe146ad664ef437030cd6f38ba7c95.js

application-4ebe146ad664ef437030cd6f38ba7c95.js

36 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

30 ms

boylogo-2015@2x-737c42409d6091a75df946892c3745f0.jpg

boylogo-2015@2x-737c42409d6091a75df946892c3745f0.jpg

17 ms

stripe-a863a55e7edaab8de8dbad90e1c94075.png

stripe-a863a55e7edaab8de8dbad90e1c94075.png

24 ms

glyphicons-halflings-d698663cc212b47fba725c0d192ad446.png

glyphicons-halflings-d698663cc212b47fba725c0d192ad446.png

21 ms

socialicons@2x-7272430215c8a65b97fc83f597ce0e78.png

socialicons@2x-7272430215c8a65b97fc83f597ce0e78.png

22 ms

vote_closed-a9afe27da1b8db53dec103746f289a1f.jpg

vote_closed-a9afe27da1b8db53dec103746f289a1f.jpg

28 ms

Variable_black-webfont-81d02e09ef0d4870a3c5cc703f4d2990.woff

Variable_black-webfont-81d02e09ef0d4870a3c5cc703f4d2990.woff

25 ms

Variable_bold-webfont-d33f1fca63336323270811f62a8a2e9f.woff

Variable_bold-webfont-d33f1fca63336323270811f62a8a2e9f.woff

23 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

Accessibility Review

voting.interiordesign.net accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

voting.interiordesign.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

voting.interiordesign.net SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Voting.interiordesign.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Voting.interiordesign.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

voting.interiordesign.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Voting Interior Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: