Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

webmail.iib.ws

MailEnable - Webmail

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

101 ms

webmail.iib.ws screenshot

About Website

Visit webmail.iib.ws now to see the best up-to-date Webmail Iib content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webmail.iib.ws

Visit webmail.iib.ws

Key Findings

We analyzed Webmail.iib.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webmail.iib.ws performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

81/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webmail.iib.ws

1141 ms

login.aspx

229 ms

me.css

464 ms

LIBCore_9.05.js

195 ms

LIBMerge_9.05.js

642 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Webmail.iib.ws and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Webmail.iib.ws.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 691.0 kB (76%)

Content Size

906.5 kB

After Optimization

215.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Webmail.iib.ws main page is 906.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 537.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 10.3 kB
  • After minification 9.2 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 110 B

  • Original 32.5 kB
  • After minification 32.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webmail Iib images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 394.9 kB

  • Original 537.3 kB
  • After minification 537.3 kB
  • After compression 142.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 394.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 289.1 kB

  • Original 326.4 kB
  • After minification 262.2 kB
  • After compression 37.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmail.iib.ws needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 289.1 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmail Iib. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

webmail.iib.ws accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

webmail.iib.ws best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webmail.iib.ws SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmail.iib.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webmail.iib.ws main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webmail Iib. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: