2.6 sec in total
874 ms
1.6 sec
191 ms
Visit jackcoxill.com now to see the best up-to-date Jackcoxill content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jackcoxill.com
Visit jackcoxill.comWe analyzed Jackcoxill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 874 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
jackcoxill.com performance score
874 ms
197 ms
5 ms
169 ms
261 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Jackcoxill.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (874 ms) belongs to the original domain Jackcoxill.com.
Page size can be reduced by 611.9 kB (73%)
838.3 kB
226.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jackcoxill.com main page is 838.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 486.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 510 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jackcoxill needs image optimization as it can save up to 510 B or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 214.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 214.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 388.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jackcoxill.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 388.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (75%)
32
8
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jackcoxill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jackcoxill.com
874 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
197 ms
jquery-ui.css
5 ms
wp-coreg-style.css
169 ms
dashicons.min.css
261 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
156 ms
iprofit-frontend.css
160 ms
style.min.css
217 ms
default.min.css
454 ms
jquery.js
395 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
323 ms
wp-coreg-core.js
235 ms
op-jquery-base-all.min.js
310 ms
common.min.js
293 ms
core.min.js
330 ms
widget.min.js
362 ms
mouse.min.js
385 ms
resizable.min.js
391 ms
draggable.min.js
394 ms
button.min.js
428 ms
position.min.js
539 ms
dialog.min.js
541 ms
comment-reply.min.js
541 ms
iprofit-frontend.js
542 ms
op-front-all.min.js
570 ms
menus.min.js
543 ms
ga.js
32 ms
html-bg.jpg
129 ms
sidebar-right-bg.png
129 ms
footer.jpg
128 ms
__utm.gif
76 ms
close.png
77 ms
loading.gif
75 ms
jackcoxill.com SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jackcoxill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Jackcoxill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jackcoxill.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jackcoxill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: