Tools & Wizards About Us
jambolo.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

jambolo.com

Jambolo

Page Load Speed

301 ms in total

First Response

18 ms

Resources Loaded

227 ms

Page Rendered

56 ms

jambolo.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jambolo.com now to see the best up-to-date Jambolo content for Nigeria and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jambolo.com

Web site created using create-react-app

Visit jambolo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jambolo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 283 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jambolo.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

22/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value420 ms

66/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.6 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jambolo.com

18 ms

jambolo.com

64 ms

bootstrap.min.css

41 ms

aos.css

57 ms

main.1c3df091.js

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Jambolo.com, 29% (4 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 21% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (114 ms) relates to the external source Maps.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 218.6 kB (67%)

Content Size

324.8 kB

After Optimization

106.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Jambolo.com main page is 324.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 323.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 658 B

  • Original 1.4 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 752 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 658 B or 47% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 217.9 kB

  • Original 323.4 kB
  • After minification 323.4 kB
  • After compression 105.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 217.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (80%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jambolo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jambolo.com

jambolo.com

18 ms

jambolo.com

jambolo.com

64 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

41 ms

aos.css

aos.css

57 ms

main.1c3df091.js

main.1c3df091.js

47 ms

main.ca51927e.css

main.ca51927e.css

45 ms

js

js

114 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

46 ms

aos.js

aos.js

68 ms

css2

css2

33 ms

css2

css2

52 ms

css2

css2

54 ms

aos.css

aos.css

15 ms

aos.js

aos.js

15 ms

Accessibility Review

jambolo.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

jambolo.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the geolocation permission on page load

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jambolo.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jambolo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Jambolo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jambolo.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jambolo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: