Tools & Wizards About Us
jamesbiskey.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

jamesbiskey.com

James Biskey

Page Load Speed

827 ms in total

First Response

56 ms

Resources Loaded

582 ms

Page Rendered

189 ms

jamesbiskey.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing James Biskey content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jamesbiskey.com

Yo.!MAG Responsive Blogger Template|Yo..! Templates

Visit jamesbiskey.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jamesbiskey.com page load time and found that the first response time was 56 ms and then it took 771 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jamesbiskey.com performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.023

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jamesbiskey.com

56 ms

www.jamesbiskey.com

73 ms

welcome.html

91 ms

3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css

39 ms

authorization.css

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Jamesbiskey.com, 45% (10 requests) were made to Blogger.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (165 ms) relates to the external source Midwestcoastfamily.files.wordpress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.6 kB (24%)

Content Size

768.3 kB

After Optimization

582.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jamesbiskey.com main page is 768.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 481.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 38.0 kB

  • Original 50.1 kB
  • After minification 49.8 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 481.3 kB
  • After minification 481.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. James Biskey images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 138.1 kB

  • Original 215.8 kB
  • After minification 215.7 kB
  • After compression 77.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.1 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 21.2 kB
  • After minification 21.2 kB
  • After compression 11.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamesbiskey.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 45% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (29%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of James Biskey. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jamesbiskey.com

jamesbiskey.com

56 ms

www.jamesbiskey.com

www.jamesbiskey.com

73 ms

welcome.html

welcome.html

91 ms

3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css

3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css

39 ms

authorization.css

authorization.css

82 ms

2063468179-comment_from_post_iframe.js

2063468179-comment_from_post_iframe.js

42 ms

3731899860-widgets.js

3731899860-widgets.js

43 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

67 ms

image

image

71 ms

gradients_light.png

gradients_light.png

28 ms

icon18_wrench_allbkg.png

icon18_wrench_allbkg.png

26 ms

20150804_112654.jpg

20150804_112654.jpg

165 ms

icon18_edit_allbkg.gif

icon18_edit_allbkg.gif

23 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

16 ms

comment-iframe.g

comment-iframe.g

41 ms

ServiceLogin

ServiceLogin

44 ms

comment-iframe.g

comment-iframe.g

129 ms

2218177523-cmtfp.css

2218177523-cmtfp.css

4 ms

3705630595-cmt.js

3705630595-cmt.js

8 ms

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js

30 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

4 ms

close.gif

close.gif

3 ms

Accessibility Review

jamesbiskey.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jamesbiskey.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

jamesbiskey.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamesbiskey.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jamesbiskey.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jamesbiskey.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of James Biskey. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: