Tools & Wizards About Us
jamesburden.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

jamesburden.co.uk

James Burden

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

1.8 sec

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

121 ms

jamesburden.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit jamesburden.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date James Burden content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jamesburden.co.uk

Visit jamesburden.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Jamesburden.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jamesburden.co.uk performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

23/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.202

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jamesburden.co.uk

1788 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

163 ms

style.min.css

373 ms

style.css

191 ms

front.min.css

191 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Jamesburden.co.uk, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Jamesburden.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 354.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

789.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jamesburden.co.uk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 680.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 28.5 kB
  • After minification 27.0 kB
  • After compression 7.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 680.6 kB
  • After minification 659.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. James Burden images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 103.7 kB

  • Original 186.8 kB
  • After minification 186.6 kB
  • After compression 83.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 103.7 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 207.4 kB

  • Original 247.6 kB
  • After minification 208.6 kB
  • After compression 40.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamesburden.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 207.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (60%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of James Burden. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jamesburden.co.uk

jamesburden.co.uk

1788 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

163 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

373 ms

style.css

style.css

191 ms

front.min.css

front.min.css

191 ms

style.css

style.css

189 ms

script.js

script.js

191 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

351 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

284 ms

third-party.min.js

third-party.min.js

285 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

285 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

379 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

380 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

471 ms

custom.css

custom.css

378 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

382 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

402 ms

style.css

style.css

565 ms

css

css

21 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

1418 ms

whiteMarble.jpg

whiteMarble.jpg

191 ms

James_Burden_wholesale_logo.png

James_Burden_wholesale_logo.png

96 ms

en.png

en.png

97 ms

it.png

it.png

96 ms

fr.png

fr.png

97 ms

de.png

de.png

98 ms

pl.png

pl.png

191 ms

es.png

es.png

192 ms

Meat4.jpg

Meat4.jpg

381 ms

JamesBurden-Vans1.jpg

JamesBurden-Vans1.jpg

566 ms

MeatCounter.jpg

MeatCounter.jpg

470 ms

James-Burden-vehicles-Smithfield.jpg

James-Burden-vehicles-Smithfield.jpg

460 ms

GlobalMeat.jpg

GlobalMeat.jpg

285 ms

smithfield_clock1.jpg

smithfield_clock1.jpg

379 ms

poultry.jpg

poultry.jpg

472 ms

RedMeat.jpg

RedMeat.jpg

474 ms

BurdenGroupLogo.png

BurdenGroupLogo.png

476 ms

Smithfield.png

Smithfield.png

556 ms

RedTractor_CertifiedStandards_2022.png

RedTractor_CertifiedStandards_2022.png

658 ms

aci.js

aci.js

650 ms

font

font

85 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

20 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

618 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

js

js

67 ms

Accessibility Review

jamesburden.co.uk accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jamesburden.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jamesburden.co.uk SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamesburden.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jamesburden.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jamesburden.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of James Burden. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: