Tools & Wizards About Us
jamesconnolly.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

jamesconnolly.net

Web Design, Digital Marketing, SEO & Video Agency | ProfileTree

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

16 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

jamesconnolly.net screenshot

About Website

Visit jamesconnolly.net now to see the best up-to-date Jamesconnolly content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jamesconnolly.net

Web Design & Website Development Agency with the best SEO expertise supported with digital marketing, video production, content marketing & digital training

Visit jamesconnolly.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Jamesconnolly.net page load time and found that the first response time was 16 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jamesconnolly.net performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jamesconnolly.net

16 ms

profiletree.com

412 ms

script.js

33 ms

jquery.js

128 ms

lazyload.js

122 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jamesconnolly.net, 88% (29 requests) were made to Profiletree.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Secure.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (412 ms) relates to the external source Profiletree.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 256.9 kB (4%)

Content Size

6.1 MB

After Optimization

5.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Jamesconnolly.net main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 165.6 kB

  • Original 219.3 kB
  • After minification 219.3 kB
  • After compression 53.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 165.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 89.4 kB

  • Original 5.8 MB
  • After minification 5.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jamesconnolly images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 81.0 kB
  • After minification 81.0 kB
  • After compression 79.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamesconnolly. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

jamesconnolly.net

jamesconnolly.net

16 ms

profiletree.com

profiletree.com

412 ms

script.js

script.js

33 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

128 ms

lazyload.js

lazyload.js

122 ms

ProfileTree-Agency-Logo.svg

ProfileTree-Agency-Logo.svg

51 ms

pt-video-thumb.jpg

pt-video-thumb.jpg

52 ms

Manrope-Medium.woff

Manrope-Medium.woff

97 ms

Manrope-SemiBold.woff

Manrope-SemiBold.woff

77 ms

Manrope-ExtraBold.woff

Manrope-ExtraBold.woff

88 ms

33097a948273b2cef159fe26714785ec

33097a948273b2cef159fe26714785ec

26 ms

ProfileTrees-Awards.png

ProfileTrees-Awards.png

34 ms

Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-12.09.22.png

Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-12.09.22.png

43 ms

Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-12.34.18.png

Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-12.34.18.png

69 ms

Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-11.59.37.png

Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-11.59.37.png

72 ms

Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-11.51.03.png

Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-11.51.03.png

65 ms

Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-11.02.50.png

Screenshot-2024-04-12-at-11.02.50.png

81 ms

antrim-and-newtownabbey.png

antrim-and-newtownabbey.png

67 ms

bryson.png

bryson.png

70 ms

newry-and-mourne.png

newry-and-mourne.png

137 ms

national-trust.png

national-trust.png

138 ms

department-of-children-logo.png

department-of-children-logo.png

139 ms

Maus-Homepage.jpg

Maus-Homepage.jpg

142 ms

KIX-Homepage.jpg

KIX-Homepage.jpg

138 ms

ProfileTree-Semrush.jpg

ProfileTree-Semrush.jpg

140 ms

ProfileTree-Analytics.png

ProfileTree-Analytics.png

139 ms

ProfileTree-YouTube.png

ProfileTree-YouTube.png

140 ms

image-943-1024x702.jpeg

image-943-1024x702.jpeg

142 ms

Featured-Pic-Cove-2024-05-16T192057.579-1024x484.png

Featured-Pic-Cove-2024-05-16T192057.579-1024x484.png

146 ms

Featured-Pic-Cove-2024-05-16T183805.996-1024x484.png

Featured-Pic-Cove-2024-05-16T183805.996-1024x484.png

143 ms

97067a9987a12095c173aeb6997bf1c6

97067a9987a12095c173aeb6997bf1c6

70 ms

TomatoGrotesk-SemiBold.woff

TomatoGrotesk-SemiBold.woff

28 ms

TomatoGrotesk-Regular.woff

TomatoGrotesk-Regular.woff

36 ms

Accessibility Review

jamesconnolly.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

jamesconnolly.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jamesconnolly.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamesconnolly.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jamesconnolly.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jamesconnolly.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jamesconnolly. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: