Tools & Wizards About Us
jameslawgroup.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 2

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

jameslawgroup.net

James Law Group || Serious Attorneys For Serious Problems

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

jameslawgroup.net screenshot

About Website

Visit jameslawgroup.net now to see the best up-to-date James Law Group content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jameslawgroup.net

Protect your rights and get results for personal injury, criminal defense, and civil rights cases. We provide a full-service practice, advising and representing clients throughout Missouri, with offic...

Visit jameslawgroup.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Jameslawgroup.net page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jameslawgroup.net performance score

2

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value22.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,020 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.88

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value83.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jameslawgroup.net

133 ms

www.jameslawgroup.net

283 ms

autoptimize_5db5d086f5ef8b2e84648d7b08d54170.css

30 ms

css

34 ms

jquery.min.js

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Jameslawgroup.net, 26% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (733 ms) relates to the external source App.lawmatics.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.5 MB (33%)

Content Size

29.0 MB

After Optimization

19.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jameslawgroup.net main page is 29.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 16.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 120.1 kB

  • Original 212.2 kB
  • After minification 207.6 kB
  • After compression 92.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.1 kB or 57% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 16.3 MB
  • After minification 16.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. James Law Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 9.1 MB

  • Original 12.1 MB
  • After minification 12.1 MB
  • After compression 3.0 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.1 MB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 284.7 kB

  • Original 395.9 kB
  • After minification 383.5 kB
  • After compression 111.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jameslawgroup.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 284.7 kB or 72% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (69%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of James Law Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jameslawgroup.net

jameslawgroup.net

133 ms

www.jameslawgroup.net

www.jameslawgroup.net

283 ms

autoptimize_5db5d086f5ef8b2e84648d7b08d54170.css

autoptimize_5db5d086f5ef8b2e84648d7b08d54170.css

30 ms

css

css

34 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

33 ms

api.js

api.js

33 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

288 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

47 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0yEww.woff

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0yEww.woff

271 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OCtKw.woff

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0OCtKw.woff

366 ms

intake.min.js

intake.min.js

269 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

66 ms

js

js

265 ms

autoptimize_715ee88d491a0e1d314fd6b2fa2b6fcd.js

autoptimize_715ee88d491a0e1d314fd6b2fa2b6fcd.js

62 ms

1-1.png

1-1.png

261 ms

3-Attorneys-Inside-Full-Size.jpg

3-Attorneys-Inside-Full-Size.jpg

482 ms

horizontal-on-white-png24.png

horizontal-on-white-png24.png

116 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZFhjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZFhjg.woff

129 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZFhjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZFhjg.woff

129 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZFhjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZFhjg.woff

129 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZFhjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZFhjg.woff

129 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZFhjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZFhjg.woff

129 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZFhjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZFhjg.woff

127 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZFhjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZFhjg.woff

164 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZFhjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZFhjg.woff

177 ms

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZFhjg.woff

UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_nVMrMxCp50SjIw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZFhjg.woff

177 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

110 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

110 ms

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFYzrk.woff

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFYzrk.woff

158 ms

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qcVy0.woff

EJRSQgYoZZY2vCFuvAnt66qcVy0.woff

162 ms

670c8b31-3268-4e87-bea1-877efbc2b643

670c8b31-3268-4e87-bea1-877efbc2b643

402 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

105 ms

loader.js

loader.js

53 ms

embed

embed

154 ms

117 ms

call-tracking_9.js

call-tracking_9.js

43 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

17 ms

autoptimize_b317335517d623bca8f843053a129d2c.css

autoptimize_b317335517d623bca8f843053a129d2c.css

19 ms

js

js

57 ms

wcm

wcm

13 ms

wcm

wcm

12 ms

wcm

wcm

12 ms

wcm

wcm

11 ms

churnzero.js

churnzero.js

686 ms

9062.39ff6b9c534ada75a0b4.js

9062.39ff6b9c534ada75a0b4.js

733 ms

browser.031401e75c9021ba92ac.js

browser.031401e75c9021ba92ac.js

728 ms

9062.fd0cbc12c09d59d5d2c9.css

9062.fd0cbc12c09d59d5d2c9.css

468 ms

browser.76993610e870509227cc.css

browser.76993610e870509227cc.css

458 ms

nr-spa-1211.min.js

nr-spa-1211.min.js

27 ms

Accessibility Review

jameslawgroup.net accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jameslawgroup.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

jameslawgroup.net SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jameslawgroup.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jameslawgroup.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jameslawgroup.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of James Law Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: