Tools & Wizards About Us
jamesloyola.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

jamesloyola.com

Expert Oral Surgeon | New Orleans, LA | James A. Loyola, DMD

Page Load Speed

759 ms in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

374 ms

Page Rendered

354 ms

jamesloyola.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jamesloyola.com now to see the best up-to-date James Loyola content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jamesloyola.com

The medical practice of James A Loyola, DMD in New Orleans, LA excels at planning and performing oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures. Call 504-484-7246 today!

Visit jamesloyola.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jamesloyola.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 728 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jamesloyola.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

83/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.115

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jamesloyola.com

31 ms

www.jamesloyola.com

65 ms

us.png

22 ms

kvbg-1920w.jpg

145 ms

visa.png

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Jamesloyola.com, 27% (6 requests) were made to Cdn.website.thryv.com and 23% (5 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (264 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 123.3 kB (41%)

Content Size

300.5 kB

After Optimization

177.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Jamesloyola.com main page is 300.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 146.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 85.6 kB

  • Original 113.9 kB
  • After minification 109.9 kB
  • After compression 28.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 39.8 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, James Loyola needs image optimization as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 94% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 301 B

  • Original 146.8 kB
  • After minification 146.8 kB
  • After compression 146.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (26%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of James Loyola. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jamesloyola.com

jamesloyola.com

31 ms

www.jamesloyola.com

www.jamesloyola.com

65 ms

us.png

us.png

22 ms

kvbg-1920w.jpg

kvbg-1920w.jpg

145 ms

visa.png

visa.png

64 ms

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

jquery-3.7.0.min.js

60 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

71 ms

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

d-js-jquery-migrate.min.js

68 ms

dxmscript.min.js

dxmscript.min.js

162 ms

mastercard.png

mastercard.png

58 ms

discover.png

discover.png

69 ms

amex.png

amex.png

69 ms

cash.png

cash.png

69 ms

check.png

check.png

68 ms

mx.png

mx.png

38 ms

DOC+1-1920w.jpg

DOC+1-1920w.jpg

173 ms

bgimg-1920w.jpg

bgimg-1920w.jpg

264 ms

97000b73-ce3b-45af-9367-8cb647677ae8-523h.jpg

97000b73-ce3b-45af-9367-8cb647677ae8-523h.jpg

173 ms

empty_02-799x346-1152w.png

empty_02-799x346-1152w.png

123 ms

utag.js

utag.js

17 ms

utag.1.js

utag.1.js

2 ms

dm-font.woff

dm-font.woff

4 ms

Accessibility Review

jamesloyola.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jamesloyola.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jamesloyola.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamesloyola.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jamesloyola.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jamesloyola.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of James Loyola. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: