3.6 sec in total
1 sec
1.7 sec
825 ms
Visit jamesmathe.com now to see the best up-to-date Jamesmathe content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jamesmathe.com
Visit jamesmathe.comWe analyzed Jamesmathe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
jamesmathe.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value1.4 s
100/100
25%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
1031 ms
26 ms
51 ms
108 ms
57 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Jamesmathe.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Jamesmathe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 342.5 kB (55%)
622.8 kB
280.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Jamesmathe.com main page is 622.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 259.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 88.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 88.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jamesmathe images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 164.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 164.8 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamesmathe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (63%)
30
11
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamesmathe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jamesmathe.com
1031 ms
css
26 ms
async-share.css
51 ms
style.css
108 ms
fontello.css
57 ms
default.min.css
56 ms
jquery.js
134 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
74 ms
modernizr.js
110 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
82 ms
shuffle.js
99 ms
library.js
229 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
131 ms
skeleton.css
30 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
54 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
30 ms
async-share.js
32 ms
scripts.js
27 ms
wp-embed.min.js
30 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
143 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
51 ms
ef3b5c88ec8048dd5b998866181c03c7
214 ms
af02e5e617764962f9bfd1d1c04fe220
214 ms
sampression-css-sprite.png
50 ms
cropped-FB_Header.jpg
213 ms
content-bg-rpt.gif
51 ms
separator.gif
49 ms
box-shadows.png
50 ms
ga.js
177 ms
1044282_10201388997308134_2071294782_n.jpg
232 ms
QQt14e8dY39u-eYBZmppwZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
161 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
jamesmathe.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jamesmathe.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
jamesmathe.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamesmathe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jamesmathe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jamesmathe.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jamesmathe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: