Tools & Wizards About Us
jamesnewellwelch.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

jamesnewellwelch.com

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

206 ms

Resources Loaded

787 ms

Page Rendered

319 ms

jamesnewellwelch.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jamesnewellwelch.com homepage info - get ready to check Jamesnewellwelch best content right away, or after learning these important things about jamesnewellwelch.com

Visit jamesnewellwelch.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jamesnewellwelch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jamesnewellwelch.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

jamesnewellwelch.com

206 ms

dsnextgen.com

426 ms

px.js

62 ms

px.js

65 ms

caf.js

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jamesnewellwelch.com, 29% (4 requests) were made to A.rmgserving.com and 21% (3 requests) were made to Dsnextgen.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (426 ms) relates to the external source Dsnextgen.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.6 kB (20%)

Content Size

94.9 kB

After Optimization

76.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Jamesnewellwelch.com main page is 94.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 63.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 36 B

  • Original 175 B
  • After minification 174 B
  • After compression 139 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36 B or 21% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 31.1 kB
  • After minification 21.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jamesnewellwelch needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 63.7 kB
  • After minification 58.8 kB
  • After compression 54.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (23%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamesnewellwelch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jamesnewellwelch.com

jamesnewellwelch.com

206 ms

dsnextgen.com

dsnextgen.com

426 ms

px.js

px.js

62 ms

px.js

px.js

65 ms

caf.js

caf.js

45 ms

newcafv2.js

newcafv2.js

8 ms

body-bg.gif

body-bg.gif

52 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

47 ms

last_arr.jpg

last_arr.jpg

40 ms

caf.gif

caf.gif

38 ms

slave.html

slave.html

13 ms

domainpark.cgi

domainpark.cgi

49 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

11 ms

frst_arr.jpg

frst_arr.jpg

11 ms

SEO Factors

jamesnewellwelch.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamesnewellwelch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Jamesnewellwelch.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

jamesnewellwelch.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jamesnewellwelch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: