4.2 sec in total
1.2 sec
2.1 sec
1 sec
Welcome to jamesvanderlin.com homepage info - get ready to check JAMESVANDERLIN best content right away, or after learning these important things about jamesvanderlin.com
jamesvanderlin.com
Visit jamesvanderlin.comWe analyzed Jamesvanderlin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
jamesvanderlin.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
90/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value220 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
1155 ms
43 ms
148 ms
30 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Jamesvanderlin.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Jamesvanderlin.com.
Page size can be reduced by 25.5 kB (2%)
1.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Jamesvanderlin.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JAMESVANDERLIN images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 399 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamesvanderlin.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 46% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (23%)
35
27
The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JAMESVANDERLIN. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jamesvanderlin.com
1155 ms
css
43 ms
style.css
148 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
slideshow.js
149 ms
functions.js
143 ms
reset.css
75 ms
wood_bgd.jpg
446 ms
pg_bgd.png
191 ms
header-img.png
287 ms
logo.png
219 ms
main_nav.png
215 ms
nav_ribbon_l.png
216 ms
nav-ribbon-r.png
216 ms
dropdown-bgd.jpg
218 ms
top_nav_new.jpg
210 ms
Welcome_image-th.jpg
209 ms
piano.jpg
276 ms
Jonas-Mount-th.jpg
370 ms
Hughes-Kitchen.jpg
371 ms
Orellie's-Shadow-Boxes-th.jpg
371 ms
Welcome_image.jpg
376 ms
Jonas-Mount-lg.jpg
446 ms
piano-lg.jpg
578 ms
Hughes-Kitchen-lg.jpg
466 ms
Orellie's-Shadow-Boxes.jpg
593 ms
content_bgd.png
388 ms
check.png
444 ms
connect_bgd.jpg
497 ms
vanderlin_signage.jpg
517 ms
church.jpg
514 ms
facebook.gif
530 ms
Jonas-Brothers-Nyala.jpg
566 ms
pa-prefered.png
587 ms
tDbK2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4nAfcGy6FRUI.ttf
35 ms
tDbX2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr4lLz5CwOnTWjW7BA.ttf
68 ms
tDbI2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOr9rADWGQyH.ttf
68 ms
tDbV2oqRg1oM3QBjjcaDkOJGiRD7OwStT0rU.ttf
68 ms
ga.js
64 ms
__utm.gif
27 ms
jamesvanderlin.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
jamesvanderlin.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jamesvanderlin.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamesvanderlin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jamesvanderlin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jamesvanderlin.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JAMESVANDERLIN. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: