3.1 sec in total
623 ms
2.2 sec
290 ms
Click here to check amazing JANET ROBERTSON Singer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about janetrobertsonsinger.com
Visit janetrobertsonsinger.comWe analyzed Janetrobertsonsinger.com page load time and found that the first response time was 623 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
janetrobertsonsinger.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value3.1 s
76/100
25%
Value4.8 s
66/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value10.0 s
27/100
10%
623 ms
91 ms
142 ms
128 ms
123 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Janetrobertsonsinger.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Janetrobertsonsinger.com.
Page size can be reduced by 800.1 kB (70%)
1.1 MB
343.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Janetrobertsonsinger.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 666.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 391 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JANET ROBERTSON Singer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 455.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 455.3 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 327.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Janetrobertsonsinger.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 327.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (84%)
43
7
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JANET ROBERTSON Singer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
janetrobertsonsinger.com
623 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
91 ms
events_manager.css
142 ms
shortcodes.css
128 ms
themify-builder-style.css
123 ms
style.css
132 ms
style.css
106 ms
media-queries.css
172 ms
lightbox.css
246 ms
jquery.js
285 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
202 ms
core.min.js
214 ms
widget.min.js
276 ms
position.min.js
242 ms
mouse.min.js
309 ms
sortable.min.js
312 ms
datepicker.min.js
319 ms
menu.min.js
338 ms
autocomplete.min.js
334 ms
resizable.min.js
354 ms
draggable.min.js
381 ms
button.min.js
379 ms
dialog.min.js
384 ms
events-manager.js
409 ms
js
26 ms
carousel.min.js
452 ms
themify.builder.module.plugins.js
402 ms
themify.builder.script.js
461 ms
carousel.min.js
465 ms
themify.script.js
517 ms
themify.gallery.js
516 ms
lightbox.js
512 ms
comment-reply.min.js
516 ms
wp-embed.min.js
520 ms
body-bg.jpg
249 ms
rss.png
239 ms
search.png
237 ms
home-icon.png
234 ms
img.php
237 ms
img.php
1164 ms
DJgFEn4woEI
254 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
46 ms
www-embed-player.js
73 ms
base.js
126 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
115 ms
ad_status.js
161 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
136 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
139 ms
janetrobertsonsinger.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
janetrobertsonsinger.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
janetrobertsonsinger.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Janetrobertsonsinger.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Janetrobertsonsinger.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
janetrobertsonsinger.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JANET ROBERTSON Singer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: