3.9 sec in total
707 ms
3 sec
175 ms
Click here to check amazing Janetter content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about janetter.net
Janetter is a Twitter client application. Faster, smarter, and more powerful. The best Twitter app on the net!
Visit janetter.netWe analyzed Janetter.net page load time and found that the first response time was 707 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
janetter.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value150 ms
94/100
30%
Value0.172
70/100
15%
Value6.3 s
61/100
10%
707 ms
355 ms
1045 ms
522 ms
524 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Janetter.net, 18% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Janetter.net.
Page size can be reduced by 105.4 kB (13%)
823.0 kB
717.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Janetter.net main page is 823.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 672.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Janetter images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 76.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.1 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Janetter.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (42%)
38
22
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Janetter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
janetter.net
707 ms
index.css
355 ms
jquery.min.js
1045 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.js
522 ms
jquery.sudoSlider.min.js
524 ms
fixHeight.js
358 ms
platform.js
371 ms
main.js
533 ms
plusone.js
96 ms
widgets.js
90 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
39 ms
ga.js
39 ms
bg02.png
183 ms
bg.jpg
1435 ms
janetter_logo.png
557 ms
copy01.png
176 ms
copy02_en.png
350 ms
iphone.png
694 ms
1.jpg
351 ms
2.jpg
544 ms
3.jpg
523 ms
4.jpg
524 ms
5.jpg
697 ms
appstore_banner.png
717 ms
googleplay_banner.png
718 ms
pc_btn.png
925 ms
bg02_shadow.png
864 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
35 ms
fastbutton
61 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
like.php
144 ms
postmessageRelay
53 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
20 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
34 ms
api.js
35 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
87 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
65 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
73 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
79 ms
janetter.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
janetter.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
janetter.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Janetter.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Janetter.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
janetter.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Janetter. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: