Tools & Wizards About Us
jartom.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

jartom.com

JARTOM - hale i magazyny do wynajęcia lub na sprzedaż

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

367 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

404 ms

jartom.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing JARTOM content for Poland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jartom.com

JARTOM - hale i magazyny do wynajęcia lub na sprzedaż, Magazyny, hale oferty JARTOM specjalistycznej firmy doradczej

Visit jartom.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jartom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 367 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jartom.com performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.8 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jartom.com

367 ms

jartom.com

717 ms

css2

29 ms

css

45 ms

style_1200.css

315 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Jartom.com, 21% (19 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 12% (11 requests) were made to Jartom.eu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Jartom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 141.3 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jartom.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 57.9 kB

  • Original 70.3 kB
  • After minification 65.7 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 76.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JARTOM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 108.3 kB
  • After minification 107.5 kB
  • After compression 104.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jartom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (56%)

Requests Now

82

After Optimization

36

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JARTOM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jartom.com

jartom.com

367 ms

jartom.com

jartom.com

717 ms

css2

css2

29 ms

css

css

45 ms

style_1200.css

style_1200.css

315 ms

anythingslider.css

anythingslider.css

317 ms

accept_cookie.css

accept_cookie.css

316 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

324 ms

bootstrap-grid.css

bootstrap-grid.css

336 ms

style-new2.css

style-new2.css

338 ms

rwd.css

rwd.css

420 ms

biblioteka.js

biblioteka.js

419 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

627 ms

dyn_menu.js

dyn_menu.js

430 ms

jquery.anythingslider.min.js

jquery.anythingslider.min.js

446 ms

jquery.fixedposition.1.0.0.js

jquery.fixedposition.1.0.0.js

442 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

732 ms

init.js

init.js

525 ms

rwd.js

rwd.js

537 ms

swiper.js

swiper.js

546 ms

cookieconsent.latest.min.js

cookieconsent.latest.min.js

326 ms

18223.jpg

18223.jpg

671 ms

15616.jpg

15616.jpg

691 ms

15621.jpg

15621.jpg

701 ms

18233.jpg

18233.jpg

836 ms

15618.jpg

15618.jpg

809 ms

18734.jpg

18734.jpg

823 ms

18732.jpg

18732.jpg

803 ms

15614.jpg

15614.jpg

852 ms

15619.jpg

15619.jpg

843 ms

15617.jpg

15617.jpg

909 ms

14885.jpg

14885.jpg

1357 ms

logo_jartom.png

logo_jartom.png

133 ms

20240.jpg

20240.jpg

382 ms

20232.jpg

20232.jpg

245 ms

20207.jpg

20207.jpg

244 ms

20230.jpg

20230.jpg

133 ms

20224.jpg

20224.jpg

132 ms

20218.jpg

20218.jpg

382 ms

19895.jpg

19895.jpg

497 ms

20217.jpg

20217.jpg

289 ms

20213.jpg

20213.jpg

316 ms

20212.jpg

20212.jpg

542 ms

20208.jpg

20208.jpg

542 ms

18893.jpg

18893.jpg

700 ms

18973.jpg

18973.jpg

757 ms

18999.jpg

18999.jpg

699 ms

18989.jpg

18989.jpg

768 ms

piksel.gif

piksel.gif

665 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

196 ms

page.php

page.php

494 ms

btn-fb.png

btn-fb.png

632 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

2175 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHvxk.ttf

22 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USew8.ttf

36 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVew8.ttf

52 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7z.ttf

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgoKcQ7z.ttf

67 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jvmyI.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3jvmyI.ttf

66 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyI.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvjvmyI.ttf

67 ms

js

js

106 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

38 ms

destination

destination

213 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

56 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

214 ms

ZFluMDo2EQh.css

ZFluMDo2EQh.css

181 ms

G8HUhdl8OvE.css

G8HUhdl8OvE.css

186 ms

WGN_x-CNpE8.css

WGN_x-CNpE8.css

233 ms

VWDhCULazb5.js

VWDhCULazb5.js

244 ms

5xOV5e9oy4e.js

5xOV5e9oy4e.js

236 ms

mP12tTiNgO_.js

mP12tTiNgO_.js

243 ms

o1ndYS2og_B.js

o1ndYS2og_B.js

243 ms

owo2sPJxB2z.js

owo2sPJxB2z.js

243 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

274 ms

k_PjgALRjoR.js

k_PjgALRjoR.js

277 ms

YEtUGb-ToKw.js

YEtUGb-ToKw.js

280 ms

XKFYjgE7mEh.js

XKFYjgE7mEh.js

285 ms

g2XPN2wRGmV.js

g2XPN2wRGmV.js

275 ms

E6qR0C8WEpl.js

E6qR0C8WEpl.js

278 ms

kgAz0TBWoYE.js

kgAz0TBWoYE.js

275 ms

DPxpTcknHiI.js

DPxpTcknHiI.js

283 ms

HzxD9aAXSyD.js

HzxD9aAXSyD.js

284 ms

collect

collect

161 ms

collect

collect

253 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

224 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

139 ms

301998673_472123428256920_8923397412908327755_n.jpg

301998673_472123428256920_8923397412908327755_n.jpg

45 ms

300691693_472123424923587_5592408105093665738_n.jpg

300691693_472123424923587_5592408105093665738_n.jpg

47 ms

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

27 ms

u2HYktv2mdq.js

u2HYktv2mdq.js

10 ms

dark-bottom.css

dark-bottom.css

52 ms

collect

collect

4 ms

Accessibility Review

jartom.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

jartom.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jartom.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PL

  • Language Claimed

    PL

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-2

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jartom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jartom.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-2. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

jartom.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JARTOM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: