17.1 sec in total
29 ms
16.4 sec
628 ms
Visit jd.pe now to see the best up-to-date Jd content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jd.pe
Jamie Dąbrowiecki is a UK-based website designer and developer specialising in WordPress.
Visit jd.peWe analyzed Jd.pe page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 17.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
jd.pe performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value18.5 s
0/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.405
24/100
15%
Value7.8 s
44/100
10%
29 ms
13573 ms
39 ms
488 ms
407 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jd.pe, 54% (33 requests) were made to Jdab.co.uk and 39% (24 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (13.6 sec) relates to the external source Jdab.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 292.2 kB (16%)
1.8 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Jd.pe main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 241.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 241.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jd images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jd.pe needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (83%)
30
5
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jd.pe
29 ms
www.jdab.co.uk
13573 ms
script.js
39 ms
style.min.css
488 ms
main.min.css
407 ms
sfwppa-style.css
408 ms
pagenavi-css.css
384 ms
jquery.min.js
499 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
717 ms
clipboardv201.min.js
735 ms
prism.js
826 ms
manually-start-prism.js
739 ms
code-snippet-dm-public.js
848 ms
log
440 ms
et-divi-customizer-global.min.css
768 ms
js
65 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
996 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
992 ms
scripts.min.js
1154 ms
smoothscroll.js
1094 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1186 ms
jquery.mobile.js
1150 ms
easypiechart.js
1343 ms
salvattore.js
1319 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
1419 ms
common.js
1504 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
1514 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1681 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
1659 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
1698 ms
Jamie-Hero.png
1474 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
37 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf
42 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff
42 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf
44 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-s.woff
43 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf
43 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
48 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf
64 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHw.woff
48 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf
68 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMhhKQ.woff
48 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjQbMhhKg.ttf
49 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ArQbMhhKQ.woff
49 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ArQbMhhKg.ttf
54 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_GbQbMhhKQ.woff
54 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_GbQbMhhKg.ttf
54 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_LjQbMhhKQ.woff
54 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_LjQbMhhKg.ttf
56 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjRbMhhKQ.woff
56 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_DjRbMhhKg.ttf
56 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXbMhhKQ.woff
56 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_ObXbMhhKg.ttf
61 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_N_XbMhhKQ.woff
60 ms
Qw3PZQNVED7rKGKxtqIqX5E-AVSJrOCfjY46_N_XbMhhKg.ttf
60 ms
modules.woff
1270 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
1284 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1248 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1431 ms
jd-50.png
526 ms
jdab-about-photos3.png
1317 ms
jd.pe accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jd.pe best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jd.pe SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jd.pe can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jd.pe main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jd.pe
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jd. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: