Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

Page Load Speed

866 ms in total

First Response

146 ms

Resources Loaded

569 ms

Page Rendered

151 ms

jdouglaswalker.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jdouglaswalker.com homepage info - get ready to check Jdouglaswalker best content right away, or after learning these important things about jdouglaswalker.com

Visit jdouglaswalker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jdouglaswalker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 720 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jdouglaswalker.com performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

73/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

90/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.webwalkers.biz

146 ms

stats.js

15 ms

quietnoise-style.css

28 ms

logo.jpg

15 ms

header_rt1.jpg

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Jdouglaswalker.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (175 ms) relates to the external source Webwalkers.biz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.0 kB (21%)

Content Size

28.2 kB

After Optimization

22.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Jdouglaswalker.com main page is 28.2 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 19.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 5.1 kB
  • After minification 4.5 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 574 B, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 63% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 19.4 kB
  • After minification 19.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jdouglaswalker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 686 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 846 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 844 B
  • After compression 286 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jdouglaswalker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 846 B or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jdouglaswalker. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

jdouglaswalker.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

jdouglaswalker.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jdouglaswalker.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jdouglaswalker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jdouglaswalker.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jdouglaswalker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: