1.6 sec in total
225 ms
1.1 sec
316 ms
Welcome to jdslaw.net homepage info - get ready to check Jdslaw best content right away, or after learning these important things about jdslaw.net
To contact an Amador County criminal lawyer in Jackson, call the Law Office of Jeffrey D. Seaton at 209-283-1337.
Visit jdslaw.netWe analyzed Jdslaw.net page load time and found that the first response time was 225 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
jdslaw.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
87/100
10%
Value1.9 s
98/100
25%
Value3.3 s
90/100
10%
Value770 ms
38/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value7.5 s
47/100
10%
225 ms
165 ms
58 ms
33 ms
109 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Jdslaw.net, 7% (3 requests) were made to Dpm.demdex.net and 5% (2 requests) were made to Assets.adobedtm.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (441 ms) belongs to the original domain Jdslaw.net.
Page size can be reduced by 105.7 kB (41%)
258.9 kB
153.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Jdslaw.net main page is 258.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 112.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jdslaw images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (35%)
17
11
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jdslaw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jdslaw.net
225 ms
b765737a5319f76abdd7b76fad08b44bb3bfb67f9fb38db92cd8ed750746cfc6.js
165 ms
launch-4b8eab27482e.min.js
58 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
33 ms
home_pepin_criminal_01.jpg
109 ms
creditcard-mc-visa.jpg
107 ms
JSeaton-1.jpg
172 ms
JDS_Martindale-Hubble_616x541_Optimized_FEB20.jpg
107 ms
badge.jpg
172 ms
132x146.png
121 ms
id
37 ms
EX3c3542d266c4483894170527bc8a6430-libraryCode_source.min.js
110 ms
AppMeasurement_Module_AudienceManagement.min.js
111 ms
invoca.js
166 ms
datadog-rum-v5.js
69 ms
id
48 ms
css
108 ms
js
133 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
252 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
208 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
179 ms
fa-v4compatibility.ttf
244 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
380 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
337 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
441 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8RHYOLjOWA.ttf
210 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8XbYOLjOWA.ttf
250 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8V_YOLjOWA.ttf
236 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8SjYOLjOWA.ttf
263 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8cTfOLjOWA.ttf
284 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbfOLjOWA.ttf
273 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8ajfOLjOWA.ttf
285 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8XbfOLjOWA.ttf
310 ms
raxhHiqOu8IVPmnRc6SY1KXhnF_Y8fbeOLjOWA.ttf
325 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf
327 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdr.ttf
344 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf
339 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
355 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdr.ttf
356 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdr.ttf
386 ms
id
5 ms
s79937475684564
48 ms
jdslaw.net accessibility score
jdslaw.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
jdslaw.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jdslaw.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jdslaw.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jdslaw.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jdslaw. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: