Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

jdthomson.com

Jd Thomson & Assoc. – Digital Marketer

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

281 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

920 ms

jdthomson.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jdthomson.com now to see the best up-to-date Jd Thomson content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jdthomson.com

Visit jdthomson.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jdthomson.com page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jdthomson.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value29.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10,040 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value34.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jdthomson.com

281 ms

breeze_1a2f13c1bf15c92b75a5f590383a9c4d.css

282 ms

breeze_fa06c00eff93a714802460b526e9e0da.css

37 ms

breeze_77eede6e4a0212893045477542541ea0.css

36 ms

breeze_535bc19ca40020871971f227877089ad.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 134 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (109 requests) were addressed to the original Jdthomson.com, 9% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (902 ms) relates to the external source Widgets.chayall.fr.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 200.8 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

972.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Jdthomson.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 606.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 178.5 kB

  • Original 220.4 kB
  • After minification 220.4 kB
  • After compression 41.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 19.3 kB
  • After minification 15.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jd Thomson needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

  • Original 606.0 kB
  • After minification 605.9 kB
  • After compression 588.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 510 B

  • Original 328.1 kB
  • After minification 328.1 kB
  • After compression 327.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jdthomson.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 107 (93%)

Requests Now

115

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jd Thomson. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 55 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jdthomson.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jdthomson.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jdthomson.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jdthomson.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jdthomson.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jd Thomson. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: