Access jefferiessocks.com. Kids Socks | Girls & Boy Socks | Women & Men Socks

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.1 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.127

83/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.6 s

1/100

10%

www.jefferiessocks.com

152 ms

99ba0c14c2ad306ede1d66f62c17a96f.min.css

57 ms

styles-l.min.css

40 ms

icomoon.min.css

85 ms

1dabcb0b0d360cb212684913ca783b19.min.js

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Jefferiessocks.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googleoptimize.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Chimpstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (223 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Jefferiessocks.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 223.2 kB

Original 257.7 kB
After minification 233.0 kB
After compression 34.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 223.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.6 kB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jefferies Socks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 550 B

Original 104.2 kB
After minification 104.2 kB
After compression 103.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 108.2 kB

Original 126.7 kB
After minification 18.5 kB
After compression 18.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jefferiessocks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jefferies Socks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

High

Registers an unload listener

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jefferiessocks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jefferiessocks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jefferiessocks.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jefferies Socks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Kids Socks | Girls & Boy Socks | Women & Men Socks | Jefferies Socks

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

www.jefferiessocks.com

99ba0c14c2ad306ede1d66f62c17a96f.min.css

styles-l.min.css

icomoon.min.css

1dabcb0b0d360cb212684913ca783b19.min.js

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

www.jefferiessocks.com

99ba0c14c2ad306ede1d66f62c17a96f.min.css

styles-l.min.css

icomoon.min.css

1dabcb0b0d360cb212684913ca783b19.min.js

optimize.js

c61ca31a47eee4b56c919fa5e.js

font-awesome.min.css

platform.js

print.min.css

gtm.js

embed.js

logo_big_1.png

adspace_baby_socks.png

adspace_girls_socks.png

adspace_boys_socks.png

adspace_womens_socks.png

adspace_mens_socks.png

loader-1.gif

2211_r.jpg

B2920M_white_black_r.jpg

2920_grey-heather_r.jpg

B8016W_khaki_r.jpg

2211W_ivory_r.jpg

1639_grey_r.jpg

1636_charcoal_model_r.jpg

2693_white-pink_r.jpg

jefferies-socks-gift-card_r.jpg

73027_green_r.jpg

1206_r.jpg

73056_grey_r.jpg

801_r.jpg

29328_r.jpg

22297_white_r.jpg

9377_medium-khaki_r.jpg

73020_white-multi_r.jpg

23005_purple-black_r.jpg

72983_r.jpg

72982_r.jpg

72980_r.jpg

M0145_r.jpg

X1175_r.jpg

B1181-1190_r.jpg