6.5 sec in total
2.2 sec
4.1 sec
146 ms
Click here to check amazing Jeff Harrington content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jeffharrington.net
My WordPress Blog
Visit jeffharrington.netWe analyzed Jeffharrington.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
jeffharrington.net performance score
2226 ms
133 ms
139 ms
30 ms
174 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Jeffharrington.net, 23% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Jeffharrington.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (77%)
2.4 MB
547.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Jeffharrington.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 128.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jeff Harrington needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 838.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 838.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 875.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jeffharrington.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 875.1 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (72%)
50
14
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jeff Harrington. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jeffharrington.net
2226 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
133 ms
layerslider.css
139 ms
css
30 ms
prlipro-post.css
174 ms
settings.css
175 ms
css
35 ms
style.css
489 ms
font-awesome.css
255 ms
ilightbox.css
303 ms
animations.css
273 ms
default.min.css
612 ms
jetpack.css
407 ms
jquery.js
481 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
401 ms
op-jquery-base-all.min.js
449 ms
greensock.js
579 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
581 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
579 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
762 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
790 ms
jscripts.php
624 ms
ssba.min.js
617 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
12 ms
gprofiles.js
74 ms
wpgroho.js
620 ms
main.min.js
1059 ms
jscripts-ftr-min.js
691 ms
wp-embed.min.js
689 ms
e-201612.js
14 ms
analytics.js
34 ms
pattern10.png
60 ms
jhlogo-black-320x65.png
127 ms
jhlogo-black-640x130.png
128 ms
1000niche-300x250.png
166 ms
sdk.js
233 ms
collect
40 ms
collect
192 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
74 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTY3LH2FgLjViKkqswU-xtII.ttf
67 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzJS3E-kSBmtLoNJPDtbj2Pk.ttf
70 ms
icomoon.woff
67 ms
lXoKq2PC8Z_S1wl-BwvrB-vvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
66 ms
soZfbn11PkChMcyPRwvf0evvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
65 ms
l1cOQ90roY9yC7voEhngDCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
54 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6SZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
55 ms
dI-qzxlKVQA6TUC5RKSb3yZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
54 ms
1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
73 ms
pQ091WwCqK_i0BhMWeZ4BPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
73 ms
58Izk0DtN5Jbz2A0aXUD5gLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
68 ms
FMVHfygVqGID0OoHcQzWauvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
68 ms
MZ1aViPqjfvZwVD_tzjjkwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
68 ms
tt5AAuT6S0d4gBsMij-6wwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
66 ms
_r9i_iCDHMJqAy28ODSA_gLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
159 ms
g.gif
79 ms
hovercard.css
54 ms
services.css
87 ms
337 ms
xd_arbiter.php
357 ms
xd_arbiter.php
478 ms
page.php
127 ms
V89xIM8XrVh.css
175 ms
6bIl72b-rkY.js
293 ms
TkV0upu1GVq.js
370 ms
mn6tHWuLI-Y.js
319 ms
x8BMxYCqTb9.js
318 ms
jeffharrington.net SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jeffharrington.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jeffharrington.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jeffharrington.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jeff Harrington. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: