1.9 sec in total
75 ms
1.4 sec
438 ms
Click here to check amazing Jellystone La content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jellystonela.com
Splashier, cozier, and way more bear hugs than your average vacation. It’s not just a campground. It’s Jellystone Park!
Visit jellystonela.comWe analyzed Jellystonela.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
jellystonela.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.1 s
0/100
10%
Value16.0 s
0/100
25%
Value17.1 s
0/100
10%
Value1,510 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.387
27/100
15%
Value26.7 s
0/100
10%
75 ms
15 ms
5 ms
5 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Jellystonela.com, 29% (20 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 19% (13 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (307 ms) relates to the external source Facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 198.4 kB (7%)
2.7 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Jellystonela.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jellystone La images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 138.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.8 kB or 65% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (40%)
68
41
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jellystone La. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jellystonela.com
75 ms
15 ms
jquery.min.js
5 ms
comment-reply.min.js
5 ms
jquery.js
28 ms
shutter-reloaded.js
26 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
40 ms
ngg.slideshow.min.js
39 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
9 ms
vslider.js
43 ms
jquery.form.min.js
62 ms
scripts.js
62 ms
ga.js
100 ms
bg.jpg
156 ms
header-bg.png
79 ms
logo.png
69 ms
navigation-bg.png
67 ms
divider-line.png
67 ms
mid-part.png
67 ms
top-link.png
69 ms
mid-link.png
68 ms
bottom-link.png
69 ms
passport-to-leisure.png
69 ms
welcome-banner.gif
70 ms
timthumb.php
74 ms
timthumb.php
72 ms
timthumb.php
75 ms
twitter.png
70 ms
facebook.png
70 ms
youtube.png
71 ms
club-yogi-rewards.gif
72 ms
footer-divider.gif
73 ms
bottom-mid.png
73 ms
FINKROMA.woff
35 ms
likebox.php
307 ms
__utm.gif
31 ms
McLpmVM3wCm.css
48 ms
VH4VPudaxfN.css
54 ms
6JjmkAGJU83.css
62 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
65 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
83 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
56 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
59 ms
OloiM1PZafe.js
61 ms
LTv6ZK-5zxz.js
97 ms
1FCa-btixu2.js
93 ms
Oagsvfb4VWi.js
92 ms
pObvZSrFc_4.js
117 ms
HgJbVwzBr8E.js
93 ms
H3EKDTObx05.js
92 ms
OZFAYTv-ZUg.js
121 ms
10377447_10152475690864617_8343087599185108845_n.jpg
135 ms
75890_10151385665704617_1716917172_n.jpg
17 ms
10659424_10202085976145829_4515827987757939321_n.jpg
18 ms
11987115_922264634505780_1363399414472927576_n.jpg
19 ms
12314142_427822904009050_3587670361713096232_n.jpg
21 ms
10730213_1223898337622299_3166354954659806068_n.jpg
22 ms
11902459_1744991005728484_2685771848897413018_n.jpg
19 ms
1530544_947967668589888_4585899285890198947_n.jpg
20 ms
11951901_1480435615612089_3060872546883063293_n.jpg
25 ms
12794560_1188639867827861_6475986654852211624_n.jpg
23 ms
10014552_176895702699692_276854341133846310_n.jpg
21 ms
10389410_1381514292163692_2059738191113914624_n.jpg
22 ms
376758_293929670629051_1465714279_n.jpg
25 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
13 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
10 ms
gxbPuQdXIZP.png
13 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
5 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
4 ms
jellystonela.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
jellystonela.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
jellystonela.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jellystonela.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jellystonela.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jellystonela.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jellystone La. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: