1.9 sec in total
124 ms
949 ms
807 ms
Visit jemrecordings.com now to see the best up-to-date Jem Recordings content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jemrecordings.com
Celebrating 50 years, welcome to Jem Records. Check out our artists and videos section!
Visit jemrecordings.comWe analyzed Jemrecordings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 124 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
jemrecordings.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value4.4 s
38/100
25%
Value7.0 s
32/100
10%
Value1,420 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
124 ms
44 ms
45 ms
46 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Jemrecordings.com, 31% (28 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 30% (27 requests) were made to Assets.myregisteredsite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (438 ms) belongs to the original domain Jemrecordings.com.
Page size can be reduced by 567.1 kB (25%)
2.2 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Jemrecordings.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 215.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jem Recordings needs image optimization as it can save up to 215.3 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 100.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 100.8 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 219.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jemrecordings.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 219.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (70%)
89
27
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jem Recordings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jemrecordings.com
124 ms
button.css
44 ms
browserBehavior.js
45 ms
utils.js
46 ms
shared.js
45 ms
navigation.js
48 ms
uaDefaultStylesReset.css
45 ms
popup.js
46 ms
ResourceLoader.js
46 ms
googleFonts.css
23 ms
css
13 ms
css
15 ms
css
16 ms
css
15 ms
css
13 ms
css
14 ms
css
22 ms
css
23 ms
css
23 ms
css
24 ms
css
23 ms
css
27 ms
css
32 ms
css
33 ms
css
34 ms
css
34 ms
css
35 ms
css
37 ms
css
41 ms
css
42 ms
css
46 ms
css
46 ms
css
45 ms
css
47 ms
css
50 ms
css
51 ms
css
55 ms
css
56 ms
jquery.js
125 ms
navigation.js
111 ms
core.js
113 ms
footercontact.js
117 ms
jqueryvalidate.js
25 ms
form.js
26 ms
json.js
21 ms
hoverIntent.js
21 ms
bgIframe.js
23 ms
superfish.js
23 ms
handler.js
25 ms
helper.js
39 ms
positioner.js
45 ms
structure.css
43 ms
jquery.json-2.2.min.js
43 ms
templates.js
58 ms
footercontact.css
64 ms
utils.js
65 ms
resources.js
64 ms
templates.js
66 ms
form.css
77 ms
form_generic.css
84 ms
65902296.jpeg
64 ms
115326684_scaled_325x161.png
66 ms
100252217_scaled_225x135.png
104 ms
100252217.png
163 ms
72282103.png
355 ms
74974259.png
438 ms
124342602_scaled_688x688.jpg
428 ms
123207655_scaled_849x655.jpg
355 ms
123207659_scaled_703x703.jpg
356 ms
122525325_scaled_558x507.jpg
355 ms
115326956_scaled_576x383.jpg
356 ms
115326981_scaled_480x480.jpg
428 ms
u4uHL8PhiQA
93 ms
hU0wJGJ64-8
98 ms
KV7_1fAKo8U
130 ms
2NzxCM3Y51g
151 ms
65902300.png
344 ms
65902298.png
345 ms
65902299.png
415 ms
65902301.png
416 ms
65902302.png
415 ms
65902308.jpeg
396 ms
65902303.jpeg
396 ms
logger.php
266 ms
www-player-vflMqr8uC.css
8 ms
www-embed-player.js
40 ms
base.js
63 ms
id
193 ms
8K3Zg6NpZGSge3qWJUIO0OW0x1SCW4IXoAiImY1mvc4.js
196 ms
ad_status.js
195 ms
jemrecordings.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jemrecordings.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
jemrecordings.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jemrecordings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jemrecordings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jemrecordings.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jem Recordings. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: