Tools & Wizards About Us
jessejameshardscaping.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

jessejameshardscaping.com

Home - Jesse James Hardscaping | Central PA Hardscape Contractors

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

303 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

286 ms

jessejameshardscaping.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jesse James Hardscaping content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jessejameshardscaping.com

Jesse James Hardscaping :: Central PA Hardscape & Landscape Contractors, Outdoor Kitchens, Patios, Steps, Walkways, Pool Scapes, Fireplaces, Firepits, Retaining Walls, Fencing, Permeable Pavers, Resid...

Visit jessejameshardscaping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jessejameshardscaping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 303 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jessejameshardscaping.com performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value450 ms

63/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jessejameshardscaping.com

303 ms

modal.css

97 ms

style-barcelona.css

245 ms

joomla30-barcelona-extended.css

249 ms

joomla30-barcelona-responsive.css

199 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Jessejameshardscaping.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (464 ms) belongs to the original domain Jessejameshardscaping.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.2 MB (77%)

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

939.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jessejameshardscaping.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 51.0 kB

  • Original 62.1 kB
  • After minification 60.1 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 2.4 MB

  • Original 3.1 MB
  • After minification 707.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jesse James Hardscaping needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 78% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 468.6 kB

  • Original 640.6 kB
  • After minification 581.1 kB
  • After compression 172.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 468.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 244.0 kB

  • Original 293.2 kB
  • After minification 285.2 kB
  • After compression 49.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jessejameshardscaping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 244.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (64%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jesse James Hardscaping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jessejameshardscaping.com

jessejameshardscaping.com

303 ms

modal.css

modal.css

97 ms

style-barcelona.css

style-barcelona.css

245 ms

joomla30-barcelona-extended.css

joomla30-barcelona-extended.css

249 ms

joomla30-barcelona-responsive.css

joomla30-barcelona-responsive.css

199 ms

custom.css

custom.css

151 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

201 ms

css

css

26 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

200 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

346 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

251 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

252 ms

caption.js

caption.js

252 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

293 ms

mootools-core.js

mootools-core.js

345 ms

core.js

core.js

297 ms

mootools-more.js

mootools-more.js

445 ms

modal.js

modal.js

298 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

343 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

464 ms

civic.min.js

civic.min.js

326 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

351 ms

stickyfooter.min.js

stickyfooter.min.js

352 ms

css

css

17 ms

css

css

22 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

82 ms

jjlogo-transparent.png

jjlogo-transparent.png

55 ms

f_logo.png

f_logo.png

57 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

55 ms

IMG_20171022_182056534-resized2.jpg

IMG_20171022_182056534-resized2.jpg

74 ms

jjlogo-800x.png

jjlogo-800x.png

252 ms

product-logos.jpg

product-logos.jpg

55 ms

Adam-family.png

Adam-family.png

302 ms

Justin-family.png

Justin-family.png

349 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

91 ms

97 ms

ingfont.woff

ingfont.woff

72 ms

blank.png

blank.png

57 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

56 ms

video-icon.png

video-icon.png

55 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkaVc.ttf

18 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjaVc.ttf

29 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVc.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjaVc.ttf

34 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

44 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

44 ms

Accessibility Review

jessejameshardscaping.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

jessejameshardscaping.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jessejameshardscaping.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jessejameshardscaping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jessejameshardscaping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jessejameshardscaping.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jesse James Hardscaping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: