961 ms in total
93 ms
623 ms
245 ms
Visit jessupno2.com now to see the best up-to-date Jessup No2 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jessupno2.com
Jessup Hose Company Number Two
Visit jessupno2.comWe analyzed Jessupno2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 868 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
jessupno2.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value4.4 s
75/100
10%
Value4,120 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value16.9 s
5/100
10%
93 ms
46 ms
30 ms
11 ms
6 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jessupno2.com, 38% (9 requests) were made to Yourfirstdue.com and 13% (3 requests) were made to Weatherbug.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (283 ms) relates to the external source Rhetoricalloss.com.
Page size can be reduced by 196.7 kB (13%)
1.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Jessupno2.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jessup No2 needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 123.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 81 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jessupno2.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (45%)
20
11
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jessup No2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jessupno2.com
93 ms
chart.min.js
46 ms
Stickers_125x125.css
30 ms
getSticker.html
11 ms
wxbug-logo.jpg
6 ms
sdk.js
21 ms
jn2logo.jpg
15 ms
100_back_of_t-shirt_.jpg
45 ms
volunteer_sm.jpg
14 ms
emaillogo.jpg
12 ms
sm_scannedimage17.jpg
20 ms
sm_085.jpg
20 ms
th_jn2logo.jpg
20 ms
logo.svg
16 ms
sdk.js
5 ms
121 ms
styles.css
4 ms
main.18b9ba59423ca5843683.js
258 ms
init-32417zi2p5iizgqrts5k.js
52 ms
2K0cYisN.js
231 ms
gtm.js
232 ms
lpvJm3_RkcS-vr_qgSHMbYB-jcbRkH2oNRB2URpg6t2W3jP_TPy9Na4D7qHs5MdytwG
283 ms
loader.js
242 ms
analytics.min.js
257 ms
jessupno2.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
No form fields have multiple labels
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
jessupno2.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
jessupno2.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jessupno2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jessupno2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jessupno2.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jessup No2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: