Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

jetpeel.de

Jetpeel - ANTIAGING,RENEWAL,WHITENING,SWEAT,AKNE,HAIR CARE Jetpeel transdermale Behandlung, ästhetische Pflege und dermatologische Heilbehandlungen

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

497 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

628 ms

jetpeel.de screenshot

About Website

Visit jetpeel.de now to see the best up-to-date Jetpeel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jetpeel.de

JetPeel™ ist eine Weltneuheit: Es ist das erste Verfahren der transdermalen Behandlung, das mit absolutem Komfort verbunden ist. Startseite Sowohl ästhetische Pflege als auch dermatologische Heilbehan...

Visit jetpeel.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Jetpeel.de page load time and found that the first response time was 497 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jetpeel.de performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.6 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,740 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jetpeel.de

497 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

497 ms

validationEngine.jquery.css

408 ms

widget.css

411 ms

js_composer.min.css

895 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Jetpeel.de, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Jetpeel.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (44%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Jetpeel.de main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 43.7 kB

  • Original 55.9 kB
  • After minification 52.6 kB
  • After compression 12.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 204.8 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jetpeel needs image optimization as it can save up to 204.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 275.5 kB

  • Original 517.0 kB
  • After minification 512.7 kB
  • After compression 241.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 275.5 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 197.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jetpeel.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (78%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

13

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jetpeel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jetpeel.de accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jetpeel.de best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jetpeel.de SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jetpeel.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jetpeel.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jetpeel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: