Tools & Wizards About Us
jhidc.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

jhidc.org

Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

216 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

208 ms

jhidc.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jhidc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jhidc.org

This journal is dedicated to publish material related or relevant to health informatics and medical informatics in developing countries

Visit jhidc.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Jhidc.org page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jhidc.org performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

68/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.201

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jhidc.org

216 ms

jhidc

368 ms

css

152 ms

css

37 ms

font-awesome.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Jhidc.org, 18% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (521 ms) belongs to the original domain Jhidc.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 86.1 kB (22%)

Content Size

389.0 kB

After Optimization

302.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jhidc.org main page is 389.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 192.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 15.7 kB

  • Original 20.1 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.9 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 175.9 kB
  • After minification 170.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jhidc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 64.4 kB

  • Original 192.8 kB
  • After minification 192.8 kB
  • After compression 128.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.4 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 38 B

  • Original 274 B
  • After minification 274 B
  • After compression 236 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jhidc.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38 B or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (60%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jhidc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jhidc.org

jhidc.org

216 ms

jhidc

jhidc

368 ms

css

css

152 ms

css

css

37 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

31 ms

orcidProfile.css

orcidProfile.css

242 ms

journalThumbnail_en_US.png

journalThumbnail_en_US.png

433 ms

homepageImage_en_US.png

homepageImage_en_US.png

521 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

25 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

32 ms

jquery.tag-it.js

jquery.tag-it.js

339 ms

popper.js

popper.js

360 ms

util.js

util.js

339 ms

dropdown.js

dropdown.js

340 ms

main.js

main.js

354 ms

aaaaa.png

aaaaa.png

436 ms

ojs_brand.png

ojs_brand.png

367 ms

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZqFCTx8cP.ttf

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZqFCTx8cP.ttf

24 ms

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZT1eTx8cP.ttf

ga6iaw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNVls-hfgvz8JcMofYTa32J4wsL2JAlAhZT1eTx8cP.ttf

27 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

16 ms

ga6saw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFIMZhhWnFTyNZIQD1-_FXP0RgnaOg9MYBNLg_cIrq4.ttf

ga6saw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFIMZhhWnFTyNZIQD1-_FXP0RgnaOg9MYBNLg_cIrq4.ttf

34 ms

ga6saw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFIMZhhWnFTyNZIQD1-_FXP0RgnaOg9MYBOshPcIrq4.ttf

ga6saw1J5X9T9RW6j9bNfFIMZhhWnFTyNZIQD1-_FXP0RgnaOg9MYBOshPcIrq4.ttf

35 ms

Accessibility Review

jhidc.org accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

jhidc.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jhidc.org SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jhidc.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jhidc.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jhidc.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jhidc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: