Tools & Wizards About Us
jill.consulting screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

jill.consulting

Jill Whalen Personal and Business Transformation Consulting and Training

Page Load Speed

741 ms in total

First Response

134 ms

Resources Loaded

428 ms

Page Rendered

179 ms

jill.consulting screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jill.consulting homepage info - get ready to check Jill best content right away, or after learning these important things about jill.consulting

Want to transform your life and/or your business? Learn from Jill Whalen's own personal transformation and business expertise.

Visit jill.consulting

Key Findings

We analyzed Jill.consulting page load time and found that the first response time was 134 ms and then it took 607 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jill.consulting performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jill.consulting

134 ms

js

40 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

8 ms

style.min.css

9 ms

css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Jill.consulting, 33% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (173 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 764.8 kB (81%)

Content Size

942.2 kB

After Optimization

177.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jill.consulting main page is 942.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 532.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 25.9 kB

  • Original 35.3 kB
  • After minification 33.6 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 543 B

  • Original 22.8 kB
  • After minification 22.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jill images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 266.4 kB

  • Original 351.9 kB
  • After minification 302.7 kB
  • After compression 85.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 266.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 471.9 kB

  • Original 532.2 kB
  • After minification 480.4 kB
  • After compression 60.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jill.consulting needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 471.9 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (83%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jill.consulting

jill.consulting

134 ms

js

js

40 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

8 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

9 ms

css

css

28 ms

css

css

65 ms

css

css

68 ms

style.css

style.css

36 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

25 ms

shortcodes_responsive.css

shortcodes_responsive.css

27 ms

magnific_popup.css

magnific_popup.css

24 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

27 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

26 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

93 ms

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

frontend-builder-global-functions.js

28 ms

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

jquery.mobile.custom.min.js

32 ms

custom.js

custom.js

29 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

60 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

91 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

62 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

89 ms

frontend-builder-scripts.js

frontend-builder-scripts.js

62 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

88 ms

js

js

173 ms

state-of-mind-logo5.png

state-of-mind-logo5.png

39 ms

jill-whalen-10-300x266.jpg

jill-whalen-10-300x266.jpg

40 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

43 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

49 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf

41 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

46 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf

42 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

52 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

47 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf

51 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf

48 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMPrQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMPrQ.ttf

51 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMPrQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMPrQ.ttf

53 ms

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LPrQ.ttf

1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LPrQ.ttf

52 ms

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

ETmodules_v2_4.ttf

40 ms

Accessibility Review

jill.consulting accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jill.consulting best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jill.consulting SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jill.consulting can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jill.consulting main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jill.consulting

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: