2.9 sec in total
258 ms
2.2 sec
374 ms
Click here to check amazing Jilljuneja content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jilljuneja.com
Get found online, quality leads, engage and get more customers with internet marketing, content marketing, inbound marketing, SEO, social media, email campaigns.
Visit jilljuneja.comWe analyzed Jilljuneja.com page load time and found that the first response time was 258 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
jilljuneja.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value4.8 s
66/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.023
100/100
15%
Value6.5 s
59/100
10%
258 ms
72 ms
138 ms
130 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Jilljuneja.com, 20% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (496 ms) belongs to the original domain Jilljuneja.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (80%)
1.3 MB
267.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jilljuneja.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 800.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jilljuneja needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 317.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 317.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 707.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jilljuneja.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 707.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (86%)
43
6
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jilljuneja. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jilljuneja.com
258 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
72 ms
formidablepro.css
138 ms
styles.css
130 ms
css
25 ms
style.css
162 ms
style.css
145 ms
css
39 ms
css
46 ms
css
73 ms
style.css
132 ms
shortcodes.css
149 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
200 ms
magnific_popup.css
202 ms
jetpack.css
207 ms
jquery.js
360 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
204 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
221 ms
idle-timer.min.js
276 ms
custom.js
269 ms
qppr_frontend_script.min.js
276 ms
jquery.uniform.min.js
281 ms
custom.js
287 ms
idle-timer.min.js
348 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
350 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
350 ms
custom.js
365 ms
smoothscroll.js
352 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
415 ms
waypoints.min.js
420 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
419 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
496 ms
wp-embed.min.js
421 ms
e-201611.js
3 ms
style.css
467 ms
analytics.js
67 ms
427 ms
logo.png
74 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
16 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
16 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nJRhFVcex_hajThhFkHyhYk.ttf
364 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsKDbm6fPDOZJsR8PmdG62gY.ttf
361 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nPOYkGiSOYDq_T7HbIOV1hA.ttf
359 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
366 ms
ETmonarch_2.ttf
365 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
16 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
359 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
358 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
359 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
362 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
361 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
359 ms
collect
351 ms
hovercard.css
89 ms
services.css
91 ms
collect
75 ms
255 ms
g.gif
20 ms
42c5067416874b44a231c8714203f81b
77 ms
jilljuneja.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
jilljuneja.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jilljuneja.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jilljuneja.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jilljuneja.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jilljuneja.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jilljuneja. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: