589 ms in total
152 ms
285 ms
152 ms
Click here to check amazing Ji Ludwig content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jiludwig.com
Requirements management, traceability matrix, requirement quality factors, diagram types, templates, and more.
Visit jiludwig.comWe analyzed Jiludwig.com page load time and found that the first response time was 152 ms and then it took 437 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.
jiludwig.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value8.8 s
36/100
10%
152 ms
30 ms
4 ms
75 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Jiludwig.com, 13% (1 request) were made to L.yimg.com and 13% (1 request) were made to Visit.webhosting.yahoo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (152 ms) belongs to the original domain Jiludwig.com.
Page size can be reduced by 39.3 kB (44%)
89.8 kB
50.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Jiludwig.com main page is 89.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 46.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ji Ludwig needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 28.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jiludwig.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 72% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
7
7
The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ji Ludwig. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
jiludwig.com
152 ms
colorsafe6a.css
30 ms
whv2_001.js
4 ms
LCS_logo_1a.jpg
75 ms
paw4.gif
45 ms
visit.gif
37 ms
stripe.gif
26 ms
12406efe0378722f0a103859382ed564
56 ms
jiludwig.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
jiludwig.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
jiludwig.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jiludwig.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jiludwig.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
jiludwig.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ji Ludwig. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: