Tools & Wizards About Us
jimsconcretepolishing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

jimsconcretepolishing.com

Professional Concrete Polishing | Concrete Polishing

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

374 ms

jimsconcretepolishing.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jimsconcretepolishing.com now to see the best up-to-date Jims Concrete Polishing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jimsconcretepolishing.com

Get Concrete Polishing by specialized pros in your area. We will match you with our partner contractors who can do the work you need.

Visit jimsconcretepolishing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jimsconcretepolishing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jimsconcretepolishing.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,270 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.13

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.4 s

19/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jimsconcretepolishing.com

51 ms

jimsconcretepolishing.com

762 ms

font-awesome.min.css

34 ms

css

37 ms

style.css

225 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Jimsconcretepolishing.com, 33% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (852 ms) belongs to the original domain Jimsconcretepolishing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 218.1 kB (34%)

Content Size

646.5 kB

After Optimization

428.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jimsconcretepolishing.com main page is 646.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 447.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 35.6 kB
  • After minification 23.0 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.6 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 40.6 kB

  • Original 79.6 kB
  • After minification 39.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jims Concrete Polishing needs image optimization as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 148.2 kB

  • Original 447.0 kB
  • After minification 447.0 kB
  • After compression 298.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 148.2 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 278 B

  • Original 84.4 kB
  • After minification 84.4 kB
  • After compression 84.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jimsconcretepolishing.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (71%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jims Concrete Polishing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jimsconcretepolishing.com

jimsconcretepolishing.com

51 ms

jimsconcretepolishing.com

jimsconcretepolishing.com

762 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

34 ms

css

css

37 ms

style.css

style.css

225 ms

style.css

style.css

62 ms

logo.png

logo.png

780 ms

concrete-polishing.jpg

concrete-polishing.jpg

852 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

25 ms

js

js

120 ms

lib.js

lib.js

150 ms

app.js

app.js

119 ms

lib.js

lib.js

201 ms

theme.js

theme.js

192 ms

dropzone.min.js

dropzone.min.js

296 ms

dropzone.min.css

dropzone.min.css

172 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

22 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

29 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

37 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

40 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

46 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

47 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

46 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

47 ms

Accessibility Review

jimsconcretepolishing.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jimsconcretepolishing.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jimsconcretepolishing.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jimsconcretepolishing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jimsconcretepolishing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jimsconcretepolishing.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jims Concrete Polishing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: