25.5 sec in total
475 ms
24.4 sec
621 ms
Welcome to jindarom.com homepage info - get ready to check Jindarom best content right away, or after learning these important things about jindarom.com
HOTEL @ Eastern Seaboard ,?ç????ش??? ?.??ǡᴧ , Condominium ?ش??? ?ç??? ??ͧ?ѡ????ѹ ????? ?Դ ?Ԥ???????칫պ???
Visit jindarom.comWe analyzed Jindarom.com page load time and found that the first response time was 475 ms and then it took 25 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
jindarom.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value7.0 s
33/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value9.1 s
33/100
10%
475 ms
2868 ms
918 ms
629 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Jindarom.com, 37% (27 requests) were made to Vc1i.rweb-images.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.9 sec) relates to the external source Vc1i.rweb-images.com.
Page size can be reduced by 72.7 kB (2%)
3.2 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Jindarom.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jindarom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 16.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 31% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jindarom.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (20%)
44
35
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jindarom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jindarom.com
475 ms
www.jindarom.com
2868 ms
jquery-1.3.2.js
918 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
629 ms
api.js
40 ms
stm30.js
512 ms
encrytion_password.js
327 ms
ready_bar_button02.png
305 ms
dot.gif
260 ms
bullet0098.gif
403 ms
banner68945.jpg
406 ms
banner17441.gif
514 ms
IMG_0645.jpg
508 ms
IMG_6568.jpg
528 ms
IMG_0639.jpg
609 ms
IMG_0681.jpg
733 ms
Untitled-1.jpg
741 ms
Untitled-2.jpg
753 ms
Untitled-4.jpg
770 ms
Untitled-3(1).jpg
792 ms
67593_10151929713403339_342984870_n.jpg
913 ms
Clip.jpg
1048 ms
%BA%E9%D2%B9%BE%C3%D2%C7%BF%E9%D2.jpg
1076 ms
%BA%E9%D2%B91.jpg
1011 ms
%BA%E9%D2%B92.jpg
1029 ms
%BA%E9%D2%B93.jpg
1058 ms
%BA%E9%D2%B94.jpg
1216 ms
jindarom_front_17.gif
1269 ms
Newhome_1.jpg
1285 ms
Newhome_2.jpg
1370 ms
big_pafhun.jpg
1309 ms
merge5_jindarom3.jpg
1396 ms
pro_resize.jpg
1522 ms
icon0001.gif
1518 ms
pro_resize.jpg
1542 ms
pro_resize.jpg
1559 ms
pro_resize.jpg
1717 ms
pro_resize.jpg
1726 ms
pro_resize.jpg
1762 ms
jindaromcom.css
1816 ms
highslide.css
1790 ms
powered-by-rp-2020.svg
1671 ms
lazy.gif
1904 ms
dot.gif
1326 ms
ready_bar_button02.png
1341 ms
bullet0098.gif
1394 ms
IMG_0645.jpg
3589 ms
IMG_6568.jpg
4596 ms
IMG_0639.jpg
10888 ms
IMG_0681.jpg
5993 ms
Untitled-1.jpg
9542 ms
Untitled-2.jpg
10436 ms
Untitled-4.jpg
4160 ms
Untitled-3(1).jpg
5325 ms
67593_10151929713403339_342984870_n.jpg
4642 ms
%BA%E9%D2%B91.jpg
6308 ms
%BA%E9%D2%B92.jpg
5902 ms
Clip.jpg
7715 ms
%BA%E9%D2%B93.jpg
6669 ms
%BA%E9%D2%B9%BE%C3%D2%C7%BF%E9%D2.jpg
7617 ms
%BA%E9%D2%B94.jpg
7653 ms
jindarom_front_17.gif
19885 ms
Newhome_1.jpg
8812 ms
big_pafhun.jpg
8112 ms
Newhome_2.jpg
8587 ms
merge5_jindarom3.jpg
9375 ms
icon0001.gif
8982 ms
bg0082.gif
336 ms
heading.jpg
611 ms
side0049.gif
255 ms
lazy.gif
8626 ms
side0049.gif
8852 ms
bg0082.gif
8999 ms
jindarom.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
jindarom.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jindarom.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
![]()
HY
![]()
EN
WINDOWS-874
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jindarom.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Armenian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Jindarom.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-874. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
jindarom.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jindarom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: