4.6 sec in total
504 ms
3.7 sec
360 ms
Visit jinglee.co now to see the best up-to-date Jinglee content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jinglee.co
This domain may be for sale!
Visit jinglee.coWe analyzed Jinglee.co page load time and found that the first response time was 504 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
jinglee.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value440 ms
64/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
504 ms
24 ms
1570 ms
693 ms
479 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Jinglee.co, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Jinglee.co.
Page size can be reduced by 339.7 kB (34%)
1.0 MB
664.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Jinglee.co main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 583.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.3 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jinglee images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 172.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 172.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 134.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jinglee.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 134.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (39%)
28
17
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jinglee. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jinglee.co
504 ms
css
24 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1570 ms
font-awesome.min.css
693 ms
flexslider.css
479 ms
templatemo_style.css
692 ms
modernizr.js
470 ms
jquery.min.js
1366 ms
bootstrap.min.js
924 ms
jquery.singlePageNav.js
942 ms
templatemo_custom.js
937 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1627 ms
jinglee_logo.png
284 ms
templatemo_slide_2.jpg
694 ms
templatemo_slide_3.jpg
1126 ms
templatemo_slide_1.jpg
901 ms
chqmate_product.png
1350 ms
chqmate-logo.png
251 ms
raghav.jpg
501 ms
venky.jpg
526 ms
prabhu.jpg
765 ms
vivek.jpg
768 ms
ganesh1.jpg
944 ms
map-boulder.jpg
1015 ms
map-chennai.jpg
1003 ms
soc_icons.png
1164 ms
js
96 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
collect
41 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
245 ms
jinglee.co accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
jinglee.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
jinglee.co SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jinglee.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jinglee.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jinglee.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jinglee. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: