Tools & Wizards About Us
jirfp.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

jirfp.com

Journal of International Relations & Foreign Policy (JIRFP)

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

156 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

210 ms

jirfp.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jirfp.com now to see the best up-to-date JIRFP content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jirfp.com

Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy is an international peer-reviewed journal published by American Research Institute for Policy Development. The peer-reviewed c

Visit jirfp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jirfp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 156 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jirfp.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

67/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jirfp.com

156 ms

jstyle.css

49 ms

jquery.min.js

9 ms

jquery-ui.js

8 ms

jquery.cycle.all.js

135 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Jirfp.com, 15% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (416 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 108.7 kB (29%)

Content Size

373.7 kB

After Optimization

265.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jirfp.com main page is 373.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 261.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 29.9 kB

  • Original 40.2 kB
  • After minification 35.4 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 61.7 kB
  • After minification 51.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, JIRFP needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.4 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 66.8 kB

  • Original 261.9 kB
  • After minification 261.9 kB
  • After compression 195.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.8 kB or 26% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 9.8 kB
  • After minification 9.8 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jirfp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (46%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JIRFP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jirfp.com

jirfp.com

156 ms

jstyle.css

jstyle.css

49 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

9 ms

jquery-ui.js

jquery-ui.js

8 ms

jquery.cycle.all.js

jquery.cycle.all.js

135 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

134 ms

iframeheight.min.js

iframeheight.min.js

134 ms

submission.css

submission.css

135 ms

front_jquery.js

front_jquery.js

133 ms

pu.js

pu.js

186 ms

element.js

element.js

61 ms

pu.js

pu.js

361 ms

jirfp.jpg

jirfp.jpg

62 ms

date-bg.png

date-bg.png

60 ms

tw.png

tw.png

60 ms

fb.png

fb.png

60 ms

JournalofInternationalRelationsandForeignPolicy.png

JournalofInternationalRelationsandForeignPolicy.png

62 ms

vs.png

vs.png

61 ms

vtoday.png

vtoday.png

62 ms

online.png

online.png

63 ms

logo_small.png

logo_small.png

62 ms

100 ms

platform.js

platform.js

28 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

153 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

34 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

13 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

44 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

41 ms

current.css

current.css

38 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

33 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

112 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

63 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

416 ms

478691279-postmessagerelay.js

478691279-postmessagerelay.js

22 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

18 ms

settings

settings

72 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

4 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

24 ms

embeds

embeds

21 ms

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

34 ms

Accessibility Review

jirfp.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

jirfp.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jirfp.com SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jirfp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jirfp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jirfp.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JIRFP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: