2.5 sec in total
148 ms
2.2 sec
204 ms
Click here to check amazing Jitd content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jitd.net
Justin Time Design provides 3D CAD Design for the Automotive Industry, including sheet metal stamping die design, molds, fixtures and product design.
Visit jitd.netWe analyzed Jitd.net page load time and found that the first response time was 148 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
jitd.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value3.2 s
91/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.2 s
94/100
10%
148 ms
330 ms
184 ms
182 ms
194 ms
Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Jitd.net, 6% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Jitd.net.
Page size can be reduced by 314.4 kB (21%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Jitd.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 225.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jitd needs image optimization as it can save up to 225.3 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 70.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 70.4 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jitd.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.0 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (22%)
32
25
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jitd. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
jitd.net
148 ms
jitd.net
330 ms
style.css
184 ms
nivo-slider.css
182 ms
default.css
194 ms
jquery-1.7.min.js
292 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.js
194 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
198 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
379 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
377 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
383 ms
scripts.js
383 ms
ga.js
18 ms
background.png
158 ms
trans.png
65 ms
header-top.png
357 ms
clock.gif
299 ms
menubg.png
185 ms
main_seperator.png
186 ms
hero_slider_shadow.png
302 ms
loading.gif
308 ms
1.jpg
534 ms
2.jpg
478 ms
3.jpg
658 ms
4.jpg
656 ms
5.jpg
665 ms
sim.png
598 ms
die.jpg
716 ms
support.png
1056 ms
fixdesign1.jpg
952 ms
footer.png
839 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
captiontrans.png
76 ms
bullets.png
185 ms
jitd.net accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
jitd.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jitd.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jitd.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jitd.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jitd.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jitd. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: