5.5 sec in total
678 ms
4.6 sec
236 ms
Visit jithvar.com now to see the best up-to-date Jithvar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jithvar.com
Visit jithvar.comWe analyzed Jithvar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 678 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
jithvar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value15.1 s
0/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.137
79/100
15%
Value15.0 s
7/100
10%
678 ms
997 ms
29 ms
199 ms
232 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Jithvar.com, 16% (13 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to and 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Jithvar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 127.6 kB (25%)
512.4 kB
384.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Jithvar.com main page is 512.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 340.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.3 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 41.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jithvar needs image optimization as it can save up to 41.9 kB or 74% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 36.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 36.9 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jithvar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 17% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (68%)
69
22
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jithvar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jithvar.com
678 ms
jithvar.com
997 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
default
199 ms
bootstrap.css
232 ms
select2.min.css
459 ms
megamenu.css
658 ms
animate.min.css
660 ms
owl.carousel.css
663 ms
owl.style.css
668 ms
style.css
899 ms
style1.css
684 ms
font-awesome.min.css
884 ms
themify-icons.css
877 ms
flaticon.css
885 ms
masterslider.css
895 ms
style.css
909 ms
layer-style.css
1096 ms
ms-staff-style.css
1101 ms
css
56 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.css
42 ms
jquery.min.js
1331 ms
yii.js
1161 ms
modernizr.js
1162 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1162 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1314 ms
jquery.countTo.js
1318 ms
jquery.waypoints.js
1356 ms
jquery.appear.min.js
1357 ms
select2.min.js
1364 ms
megamenu.js
1533 ms
owl-carousel.js
1537 ms
typed.min.js
1552 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1579 ms
masterslider.min.js
1803 ms
jquery.validate.js
1594 ms
custom.js
1752 ms
collect
13 ms
cd4de6a34d6d46dde68297be8cde882947252f3f.png
1717 ms
blank.gif
1734 ms
website.webp
1808 ms
software.webp
1809 ms
smo.png
1934 ms
collect
31 ms
js
88 ms
ga-audiences
96 ms
1797 ms
23.webp
1544 ms
loader.gif
1375 ms
logo.png
1375 ms
embed
209 ms
plus.png
929 ms
shape-bg.png
1074 ms
call-to-action.webp
1542 ms
5aUz9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7VptuA.ttf
23 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5alOqEp2jg.ttf
39 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5fFPqEp2jg.ttf
54 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5eFIqEp2jg.ttf
61 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5f1LqEp2jg.ttf
62 ms
fontawesome-webfont3295.woff
1310 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
61 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
61 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
62 ms
themify9f24.woff
1317 ms
js
61 ms
loading-2.gif
407 ms
black-skin-2.png
385 ms
3.webp
741 ms
slider-inner1.webp
583 ms
light-skin-1.png
610 ms
twk-arr-find-polyfill.js
56 ms
twk-object-values-polyfill.js
58 ms
twk-event-polyfill.js
186 ms
twk-entries-polyfill.js
78 ms
twk-iterator-polyfill.js
65 ms
twk-promise-polyfill.js
64 ms
twk-main.js
106 ms
twk-vendor.js
157 ms
twk-chunk-vendors.js
206 ms
twk-chunk-common.js
193 ms
twk-runtime.js
132 ms
twk-app.js
162 ms
jithvar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
jithvar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
jithvar.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jithvar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jithvar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jithvar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jithvar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: