20.4 sec in total
3.1 sec
17.1 sec
219 ms
Visit jltps.com now to see the best up-to-date Jltps content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jltps.com
合影,拍合影, 集体照 ,洗照片,团体合影,摄像 ,北京的图片社,三维实景拍摄 ,团体合影 ,合影拍摄 , 北京拍集体照 ,北京三维实景拍摄 ,三维实景,三维全景,360度全景,集体合影,拍集体照,集体照拍摄,毕业合影,会议摄影,会议摄像,集体照拍摄,北京拍合影
Visit jltps.comWe analyzed Jltps.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.1 sec and then it took 17.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
jltps.com performance score
3087 ms
451 ms
708 ms
1296 ms
1045 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Jltps.com, 18% (17 requests) were made to Qiao.baidu.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Lxbjs.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.7 sec) relates to the external source Pic.jltps.com.
Page size can be reduced by 190.1 kB (34%)
552.0 kB
361.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Jltps.com main page is 552.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 402.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jltps needs image optimization as it can save up to 82.9 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 38.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jltps.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (44%)
94
53
The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jltps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jltps.com
3087 ms
style.css
451 ms
index.css
708 ms
jquery.min.js
1296 ms
jquery.fancybox-0.1b.js
1045 ms
index.js
695 ms
marquee.js
690 ms
qq.css
722 ms
ServiceQQ.js
830 ms
stat.php
1131 ms
9.gif
6118 ms
bg1.jpg
937 ms
2.gif
326 ms
3.gif
240 ms
s_20100413194653_982.jpg
735 ms
s_20100413195613_816.jpg
771 ms
s_20100413200412_862.jpg
782 ms
s_20100413201150_618.jpg
703 ms
20100527165954_528.jpg
647 ms
15.gif
2015 ms
23.gif
935 ms
qq.gif
1103 ms
link.gif
1137 ms
4.gif
1146 ms
1.gif
1165 ms
3.gif
1177 ms
7.gif
1460 ms
9.gif
1493 ms
20100501113847_241.jpg
8712 ms
s_20100411131107_366.jpg
6704 ms
s_20100411125326_536.jpg
8164 ms
s_20100411122530_265.jpg
6929 ms
1.gif
3256 ms
title_bj.gif
1380 ms
7.gif
1392 ms
6.gif
1604 ms
7888888.gif
1615 ms
8.gif
1807 ms
10.gif
1842 ms
11.gif
1837 ms
12.gif
1847 ms
13.gif
2854 ms
20.gif
2047 ms
list_11.gif
2173 ms
27.gif
2055 ms
26.gif
2303 ms
28.gif
2275 ms
29.gif
2287 ms
link_1.gif
2516 ms
35.gif
2962 ms
h.js
785 ms
siderIM_bg.gif
2507 ms
qq.gif
2419 ms
qq.gif
2574 ms
qq.gif
2136 ms
qq.gif
2274 ms
qq.gif
2275 ms
qq.gif
2450 ms
siderIM_right.gif
2474 ms
lxb.js
1386 ms
b.js
1368 ms
stat.htm
167 ms
core.php
707 ms
hm.gif
349 ms
siderIM_bottom.gif
3017 ms
qq_1.gif
2299 ms
9.gif
1319 ms
pic.gif
743 ms
bsl.js
640 ms
log.gif
317 ms
_l.js
729 ms
Enter.php
535 ms
main_icon_invite_mess_api.js
3396 ms
main.css
564 ms
fix.css
1316 ms
version.js
1750 ms
app.gif
1351 ms
log.gif
331 ms
mobile.css
331 ms
log.gif
541 ms
02.jpg
1737 ms
m-webim-lite.css
1611 ms
m-webim-lite.js
1279 ms
Refresh.php
246 ms
iconbg.jpg
969 ms
02.png
1193 ms
icon.png
754 ms
icon_close.png
6615 ms
stat.gif
1639 ms
mess-text.png
1583 ms
messbtn.png
1750 ms
mess.gif
1902 ms
btn.png
5282 ms
02_small.jpg
1059 ms
btn.png
2133 ms
Refresh.php
246 ms
jltps.com SEO score
ZH
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jltps.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jltps.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jltps.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jltps. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: