3.7 sec in total
711 ms
2.5 sec
494 ms
Welcome to jmarkinspections.com homepage info - get ready to check JMark Inspections best content right away, or after learning these important things about jmarkinspections.com
Since your home or business site may be the biggest investment of your life, retaining a professional inspector from JMark Inspections will ensure your purchase doesn't come with unexpected issue...
Visit jmarkinspections.comWe analyzed Jmarkinspections.com page load time and found that the first response time was 711 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
jmarkinspections.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.046
99/100
15%
Value7.3 s
49/100
10%
711 ms
50 ms
152 ms
68 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Jmarkinspections.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (711 ms) belongs to the original domain Jmarkinspections.com.
Page size can be reduced by 509.8 kB (30%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Jmarkinspections.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 997.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JMark Inspections images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 134.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.8 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 297.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jmarkinspections.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 297.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (55%)
49
22
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JMark Inspections. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jmarkinspections.com
711 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
50 ms
style.min.css
152 ms
style.css
68 ms
style.css
72 ms
style.css
75 ms
style.css
73 ms
style.css
83 ms
classic-themes.min.css
103 ms
style.css
252 ms
font-awesome.min.css
145 ms
css
18 ms
style.css
207 ms
modern.css
117 ms
modernizr-2.7.1-min.js
140 ms
jquery.min.js
213 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
180 ms
easy-testimonials-reveal.js
181 ms
responsiveslides.css
179 ms
public.css
212 ms
index.js
219 ms
index.js
225 ms
small-menu.js
244 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
245 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
243 ms
hcaptcha.js
367 ms
styles.css
367 ms
controls.js
368 ms
hcaptcha-cf7.min.js
368 ms
embed
239 ms
logo-1.png
71 ms
facebook-icon.png
69 ms
twitter-icon.png
70 ms
google-icon.png
69 ms
youtube-icon.png
70 ms
slide-3-0x0.jpg
149 ms
slide-1-0x0.jpg
167 ms
slide-2-0x0.jpg
190 ms
body-bg.jpg
263 ms
profile.jpg
119 ms
suprakey-2.jpg
119 ms
hcaptcha-div-logo.svg
148 ms
g-review.png
152 ms
military-first.jpg
162 ms
home2-bg.jpg
182 ms
home.jpg
201 ms
commercial.jpg
195 ms
pool.jpg
209 ms
peace.jpg
221 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
16 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
17 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
52 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
52 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
51 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
170 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
198 ms
js
57 ms
jmarkinspections.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
jmarkinspections.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jmarkinspections.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jmarkinspections.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jmarkinspections.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jmarkinspections.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JMark Inspections. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: