Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

jmecc.com

Web Server's Default Page

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

552 ms

Resources Loaded

788 ms

Page Rendered

64 ms

jmecc.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jmecc content for Malaysia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jmecc.com

Visit jmecc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jmecc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 552 ms and then it took 852 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jmecc.com performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jmecc.com

552 ms

default-server-index.js

219 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jmecc.com, 50% (1 request) were made to Assets.plesk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (552 ms) belongs to the original domain Jmecc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 693.0 kB (17%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Jmecc.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 875 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 779 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 875 B or 53% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 149.1 kB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 3.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jmecc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 257.8 kB

  • Original 418.8 kB
  • After minification 410.7 kB
  • After compression 160.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 257.8 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 285.2 kB

  • Original 344.9 kB
  • After minification 329.9 kB
  • After compression 59.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jmecc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 285.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jmecc. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

jmecc.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

jmecc.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

jmecc.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jmecc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jmecc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jmecc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: