3.5 sec in total
171 ms
2.5 sec
773 ms
Visit jmfieldmarketing.com now to see the best up-to-date Jm Field Marketing content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jmfieldmarketing.com
Trusted by leading brands for over 30 years to provide ecommerce fulfillment services. Contact us to get a quote on your fulfillment needs.
Visit jmfieldmarketing.comWe analyzed Jmfieldmarketing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
jmfieldmarketing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value11.6 s
0/100
25%
Value13.0 s
2/100
10%
Value1,100 ms
23/100
30%
Value0.073
96/100
15%
Value20.2 s
2/100
10%
171 ms
1059 ms
94 ms
166 ms
94 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jmfieldmarketing.com, 83% (72 requests) were made to Jmfield.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Jmfield.com.
Page size can be reduced by 881.0 kB (67%)
1.3 MB
440.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Jmfieldmarketing.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 537.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 96.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 21.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jm Field Marketing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 300.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 300.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 463.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jmfieldmarketing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 463.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (62%)
76
29
The browser has sent 76 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jm Field Marketing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jmfieldmarketing.com
171 ms
jmfield.com
1059 ms
livechat-icons.css
94 ms
style.css
166 ms
font-inter.css
94 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
124 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
192 ms
swiper.min.css
122 ms
post-5.css
101 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
127 ms
global.css
176 ms
post-13.css
169 ms
post-1059.css
170 ms
livechat-contact-button.css
173 ms
livechat-quality-badge.css
198 ms
post-1062.css
199 ms
css
42 ms
fontawesome.min.css
231 ms
solid.min.css
204 ms
brands.min.css
209 ms
jquery.min.js
252 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
230 ms
index.js
236 ms
contact-button.js
40 ms
quality-badge.js
33 ms
js
69 ms
js
126 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
236 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
218 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
350 ms
widget.js
9 ms
post-1068.css
363 ms
animations.min.css
362 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
363 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
364 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
364 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
365 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
369 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
366 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
366 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
367 ms
hooks.min.js
367 ms
i18n.min.js
368 ms
frontend.min.js
367 ms
waypoints.min.js
359 ms
core.min.js
332 ms
frontend.min.js
326 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
305 ms
gtm.js
153 ms
JMF_Tagline_Logo_Horizontal-300x87.png
127 ms
marketing_fulfillment.png
128 ms
product_fulfillment.png
128 ms
ecommerce_fulfillment.png
129 ms
kitting_fulfillment.png
129 ms
Mii_logo.png
130 ms
NCS.png
131 ms
keratin-perfect2.png
129 ms
silversea2.png
202 ms
sheets2.png
203 ms
salad-creations21.png
204 ms
pivotal-fintess.png
204 ms
parkson2.png
205 ms
neptune2.png
205 ms
norwegian2.png
204 ms
keratin-complex2.png
205 ms
kaplan.png
205 ms
heart-gallery2.png
91 ms
crystal-palace2.png
91 ms
celsius2.png
89 ms
paul-gauguin2.png
90 ms
autonation2.png
90 ms
Amadeus.png
130 ms
pioneerdj-logo.png
130 ms
pero-logo.png
129 ms
cbs-sports.png
128 ms
JMF-Logo_Horizontal_Wht_RGB-01-300x114.png
126 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
122 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
178 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
191 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
191 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
190 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
191 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
188 ms
eicons.woff
188 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
173 ms
tracking.js
117 ms
print.css
36 ms
jmfieldmarketing.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
jmfieldmarketing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jmfieldmarketing.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jmfieldmarketing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jmfieldmarketing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jmfieldmarketing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jm Field Marketing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: