2.9 sec in total
86 ms
2 sec
857 ms
Click here to check amazing Jmind content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jmind.com
JMI have been servicing the machines we sell for over 40 years. We refurbish the machines and test them to ensure they are fully operational prior to shipment.
Visit jmind.comWe analyzed Jmind.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
jmind.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value7.2 s
30/100
10%
Value230 ms
87/100
30%
Value0.133
81/100
15%
Value10.6 s
23/100
10%
86 ms
16 ms
30 ms
43 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Jmind.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (176 ms) belongs to the original domain Jmind.com.
Page size can be reduced by 94.4 kB (10%)
961.6 kB
867.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Jmind.com main page is 961.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 619.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 93.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 93.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jmind images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 194 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 572 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jmind.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (74%)
65
17
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jmind. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jmind.com
86 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
16 ms
woocommerce.css
30 ms
style.css
43 ms
style.min.css
43 ms
theme.min.css
42 ms
header-footer.min.css
43 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
43 ms
frontend.min.css
47 ms
swiper.min.css
55 ms
e-swiper.min.css
54 ms
post-7465.css
53 ms
frontend.min.css
78 ms
animations.min.css
55 ms
post-2.css
61 ms
post-7482.css
68 ms
post-7544.css
66 ms
css
31 ms
fontawesome.min.css
67 ms
solid.min.css
69 ms
brands.min.css
74 ms
regular.min.css
90 ms
jquery.min.js
95 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
89 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
93 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
93 ms
js.cookie.min.js
93 ms
woocommerce.min.js
129 ms
js
58 ms
wc-blocks.css
125 ms
widget-image.min.css
127 ms
widget-heading.min.css
147 ms
widget-spacer.min.css
146 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
146 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
148 ms
widget-social-icons.min.css
147 ms
apple-webkit.min.css
146 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
156 ms
order-attribution.min.js
156 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
151 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
137 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
126 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
126 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
129 ms
hooks.min.js
126 ms
i18n.min.js
126 ms
frontend.min.js
122 ms
core.min.js
116 ms
frontend.min.js
119 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
119 ms
cropped-JM-Industries.jpeg
45 ms
Suss-MA-6.jpg
64 ms
Laurier-SA202-1024x768.jpg
61 ms
TEMESCAL-FC-1800TE.jpg
61 ms
Loomis-20240701_161133-1024x541.jpg
63 ms
Thermo-Neslab-HX-300.jpg
87 ms
OXFORD-UPGRADED.jpg
63 ms
1-Technics-PEIIA-300x300.jpg
63 ms
TEMESCAL-FC-1800TE-300x300.jpg
63 ms
Laurier-SA202-300x300.jpg
87 ms
MPM-TF-100-1-300x300.jpg
87 ms
Suss-MA-6-300x300.jpg
87 ms
MRC-903M--300x300.jpg
86 ms
aIMG_20220105_1110471001-300x300.jpg
85 ms
C20220316_102523-300x300.jpg
176 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
46 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
56 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
67 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
77 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
78 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
77 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
49 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
19 ms
rP2Fp2K15kgb_F3ibfW4Hz-F.woff
4 ms
eicons.woff
48 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
48 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
14 ms
jmind.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
jmind.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
jmind.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jmind.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jmind.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jmind.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jmind. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: