Tools & Wizards About Us
jmontreal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 39

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 62

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

jmontreal.com

JMontreal Jewish Dating|Matchmaker|Matchmaking|Singles - JMontreal

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

jmontreal.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jmontreal.com now to see the best up-to-date JMontreal content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jmontreal.com

JMontreal combines Montreal, Quebec Jewish matchmaking with Jewish internet dating so Jewish singles can use a Jewish matchmaker through Monkland Jewish dating site

Visit jmontreal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jmontreal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jmontreal.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.087

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jmontreal.com

172 ms

www.jmontreal.com

105 ms

www.jmontreal.com

764 ms

analytics.js

180 ms

home-new.css

398 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Jmontreal.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (822 ms) belongs to the original domain Jmontreal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 338.9 kB (10%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jmontreal.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 42.9 kB

  • Original 54.8 kB
  • After minification 48.8 kB
  • After compression 11.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 142.8 kB

  • Original 2.7 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JMontreal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 144.7 kB

  • Original 524.6 kB
  • After minification 524.6 kB
  • After compression 379.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.7 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 43.5 kB
  • After minification 43.5 kB
  • After compression 35.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jmontreal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 19% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (56%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JMontreal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jmontreal.com

jmontreal.com

172 ms

www.jmontreal.com

www.jmontreal.com

105 ms

www.jmontreal.com

www.jmontreal.com

764 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

180 ms

home-new.css

home-new.css

398 ms

desktop-new.css

desktop-new.css

318 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

391 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

83 ms

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

jquery-2.1.1.min.js

390 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

315 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

467 ms

retina.min.js

retina.min.js

467 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

466 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

466 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

527 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

576 ms

script-home.js

script-home.js

756 ms

parallax.js

parallax.js

636 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

518 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

509 ms

Cookies.js

Cookies.js

612 ms

Words.js

Words.js

611 ms

TranslateWords.js

TranslateWords.js

729 ms

MMKeywordFields.js

MMKeywordFields.js

730 ms

GetMMKeywordFields.js

GetMMKeywordFields.js

750 ms

api.js

api.js

505 ms

collect

collect

248 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

152 ms

jmontreallogo.png

jmontreallogo.png

721 ms

step1.png

step1.png

718 ms

step2.png

step2.png

723 ms

step3.png

step3.png

724 ms

step4.png

step4.png

822 ms

step5.png

step5.png

820 ms

jmontrealpartners.jpg

jmontrealpartners.jpg

822 ms

jmontrealmain.jpg

jmontrealmain.jpg

727 ms

jmontrealmm.jpg

jmontrealmm.jpg

728 ms

jmontrealevents.jpg

jmontrealevents.jpg

730 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

791 ms

no-repeat.png

no-repeat.png

731 ms

Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff

Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff

809 ms

js

js

387 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

468 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

221 ms

Accessibility Review

jmontreal.com accessibility score

39

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jmontreal.com best practices score

62

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Registers an unload listener

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jmontreal.com SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jmontreal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jmontreal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jmontreal.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JMontreal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: